rspca animal rescue

[asal]

 

 

So made a huge mistake watching this, the program still on.                                                 Ridiculous that over 24 years and still a trigger point

rspca nsw are called to two lost dogs, the younger

German shepherd puppy hit by a car, "leg badly broken, requires immediate surgery BUT without being able to contact the owner for permission to operate by law, they cannot operate.  Unless they can get the owners permission to operate, the puppy will have to be put down".

 

LAIR'S, LAIR'S, LAIR'S

 

they took my stringy, took three skin plugs so big they had to put two stitches in each of them.  An operation according to the above , by law they cannot do without my permission!

 

done solely to try and find proof he had  sarcoptic mange, even though the seizing inspector had already been told by my dogs vet that he has blue gene alopecia, they told the then Minister for Agriculture Richard Amery, That they "had seized him because the dogs vet had no records of testing the dog" Despite the fact that the dog had been stolen at 1pm on Sunday November 1999 and never been in contact with the dogs vet until Monday morning when Richard phoned demanding they return him as he only has blue gene alopecia, (Richard rang them every day for the 13 days they had him demanding his return)  he had diagnosed he had it when he was 4 months old and he began to show short hair along the top of his tail and topline to his shoulders on an otherwise long coat pup, bit like a mini lion.  A condition that bears NO resemblance to either demodectic or sarcoptic mange, yet their own vet not only had never heard of blue gene alopecia but refused to even look it up or believe the dogs vet.

 

They lied to the Minister for Agriculture to justify almost killing my dog.  When they finally exhausted their attempts to find something they could charge me with I was finally called and told I could pick him up.  He was foaming at the mouth and their idiot vet admitted he had no idea what was wrong with my dog and offered to "examine him at your cost" 

 I kid u not.

taken straight to his own vet he was found to be suffering pneumonia and a torn trachea from his vet opinion, an oversize trachea tube being forced down .

 

Dogs nsw Liaison Officer Alan Candlish had tried for 13 days to get the dog returned.  He said he had never been treated so rudely in all his years of dealing with rspca nsw. He formed the opinion,

The difference being as Alan Candlish the then Liaison Officer for Dogs NSW told me, "you have seriously pissed off someone with friends in very high places in the rspca."

 

A year later I did accidently learn who that was, interestingly that person is still a member and breeder of dogs nsw and used to play with him at the chihuahua club meetings as he always came with me. I noticed an add for that kennel only yesterday here.

 

Was heard at a show that even though failed this time would not give up getting me kicked out because I dont show enough to be considered an ethical breeder. How I learned who almost sent him to his death.

 

walk to the drum of the thought police or pay the price of persecution has been the mantra ever since for so many for way too long.

 

 

19 years of "where these smoke there's fire" (that was the date of the last time someone here wrote that about me)  because I spoke up about being stupid enough to go public my dog had been stolen by the sacred cow rspca

 

 

On a happy note, the Shetland pony in Victoria, after all the drama, "will or wont she have to be put down!"

 

They took her to a horse  vet,( non rspca.}  but taken to him and asked by them to work on her feet. and surprise, surprise, even though they could not contact the owner, was still given a general anesethic (remember nsw, same program, said they cannot without owners permission as without it poor puppy will have to be put down)   he operated  to reshape her hooves after he had removed the massive overgrowth hooves.

 

Learned a neat trick to help a foundered pony,  after trimming the hoof much as much as the vet  could during the operation and she was back on her feet, cut a block of polystyrene for each hoof, taped it to the bottom of the hoof and the ponies weight squashed it down and thus fitted to the bottom of the hoof protected the sole from the ground so pony could walk pain free until the hoof adjusted .  Lucky pony, only the front feet were overgrown.   Often is all, front and back.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited Wednesday at 11:17 PM by asal

[asal]

its on again right now if you want to watch it

 

channel 72 in nsw

[tdierikx]

19 hours ago, asal said:

German shepherd puppy hit by a car, "leg badly broken, requires immediate surgery BUT without being able to contact the owner for permission to operate by law, they cannot operate.  Unless they can get the owners permission to operate, the puppy will have to be put down".

 

They could stabilise the leg with a splint to give time to find the owner. I've personally seen a dog's leg with a femur shattered into 5 pieces put into a Robert Jones splint to stabilise it until surgery could be performed a few days later. I have also stabilised a goat's badly broken leg with the same splint method until it could be seen by the vet the next morning.

 

T.

[asal]

On 17/01/2025 at 5:41 AM, tdierikx said:

 

They could stabilise the leg with a splint to give time to find the owner. I've personally seen a dog's leg with a femur shattered into 5 pieces put into a Robert Jones splint to stabilise it until surgery could be performed a few days later. I have also stabilised a goat's badly broken leg with the same splint method until it could be seen by the vet the next morning.

 

T.

 

 

 

what was so utterly glaring that NSW lied, "BY LAW they could not operate".

Yet also aired in the same episode, was the Victorian seizure of the foundered pony, they too could not locate the owner yet the surgery was done immediately..

As usual they pick and choose what they want to do and cite "the law" as the reason when choose not to . "It has food and water, our hands are tied"  no mention they tied their hands themselves because in this instance they dont want too "form the opinion/view, and seize" most likely no money to be made that time.

 

Yet this episode, NSW are prepared to kill it instead.

Edited 2 hours ago by asal

[asal]

 

 

I realised maybe some one somewhere may need to have a letter like this done and sealed, to be permanently on display, along with sending them a copy to have on file.

 

The information contained, given you this right.  Was sent to me by the solicitor fighting for the lives of the two Marama's seized some time earlier that year.

They were finally saved and returned but not before much heart ache, trauma and expense to the owner.

Same as my experience.

 

Anyway this is my version filed for ever more to at least protect you from them sneaking onto your property and taking what they like when you are not at home as was what happened to Stringy.

I think his Marama's were stolen when he was not home too? but it was many years ago now so not positive.

 

Any way, use what is highlighted in black below (like this) in your letter of notice.   It worked, and still does. .  About 10 or more years ago someone reported my 30 year old horse, didn't enter without my permission.   (you feel so hugely less violated, they Don't care a crap if you have a  breakdown from the stress they inflict. Seen it in so many over the decades)

All these decades later still works.  Discovered that when they came to do the POCTA inspection. Actually asked permission to come?

Mind she couldn't resist advising me.

"I am an rspca inspector, I have more powers than the police, which is why so many of us are shot at."

 

Couldn't believe my ear's.

Had me wondering, does she want to be shot at? so she can boast, been one of the attacked?

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

17/5/01

For the attention of

The Chief Inspector and CEO RSPCA

201 Rookwood Road

Yagoona 2199

Dear Sir,

Up to the 21 November 1999 I had a good opinion of this organisation.  This was put in doubt that day by the behaviour of your Inspector Donnelly.  The subsequent two weeks then the events of the 2.12.99 destroyed all respect for your assertions of caring “on behalf of all creatures’ great and small.

 

As a result this letter is to advise that henceforth all entry onto this property by RSPCA or its agents is 17/5/01

Denied without my express permission in writing.  THIS APPLIES TO ALL RSPCA OFFICERS AND ALL AGENTS, INCLUDING SPECIAL CONSTABLES AND MEMBERS OF THE NEW SOUTH WALES POLICE.

I also intend to use the provisions of Freedom of Information to obtain copies of all RSPCA records pertaining to the related incidents which related to my personal affairs.

If you do not respond I will then apply to the Information Commissioner.

I make this request based on the case of ;- Taylor – v – Chief Inspector, RSPCA 91999- nsw adt 23 (19 April 1999) NEW SOUTH WALES ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS TRIBUNAL 0 CITATION: Taylor – v – Chief Inspector, RSPCA

 

It is unfortunate I did not learn of my rights under Judicial Revue earlier.  Hopefully I am learning fast and will continue to learn.

Since I have now learnt the new order cares for nothing but successful prosecution even to the exclusion of the well being, even to risk the life of perfectly healthy but differently coated representative of the “creatures great and small” in a futile attempt to secure a conviction solely based on “the Inspector formed the view that the subject dog may have required veterinary treatment in relation to its presenting condition. As a result the dog was seized in accordance with section” etc.

Excuse me, but while I waited for the return of my dog I was given the Autumn Edition to read.  Why was my dog and I not accorded the same treatment and opportunity as Ms Chalmers????????

Or, was she before the new order came in force?

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by asal

[Little Gifts]

My sister was at a shopping centre only yesterday and was accosted by someone trying to raise funds for the RSPCA so they could prosecute more animal abusers and neglectors. He claimed they'd only been able to afford  to do 14 prosecutions in QLD last year. My sister said I would be so proud of her. She told him but you have enough money to prosecute more now - have you seen your own profit line? Then she went on in detail about how they use people's emotions to raise money but don't spend it on the animals. If they are too sick or have behavioural issues you put them to sleep pretty quick. The others get farmed out to other rescues to vet and rehome. She said she went on and on and he was trying to find  a hole to crawl in to.

 

But maybe he might actually explore the values and achievements of the organisation more and make up his own mind? I think the only way they are going away is if their finances shrink and they can't afford to operate. They only represent themselves these  days.