_PL_ Posted October 23, 2020 Share Posted October 23, 2020 Definitely not meaning to bring up a debate! I'm well aware it's a hot button topic. Anyway, this might be something you've already seen, they expanded the range of breeds involved in a new study and compared to the past studies. (Article dated Sept 2020) I found it interesting anyway. https://www.dvm360.com/view/study-gauges-best-canine-sterilization-ages-by-breed-and-gender?fbclid=IwAR3RMkbOEM69vqQ5whsZtB9CFs1Y4gPHl_-uUnOonNHrdAYDj1UdwuvKbPI Present study referenced (8) 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tassie Posted October 24, 2020 Share Posted October 24, 2020 Thanks so much for posting this, @Powerlegs. It was referenced by Dr Christine Zink in a webinar I was watching last week on the Avidog site - my dogs are enrolled in their Fit For Life canine fitness program, and there are some really helpful webinars as well. It's so refreshing to have some work which covers the various pros and cons acroass a range of breeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandgrubber Posted October 24, 2020 Share Posted October 24, 2020 (edited) An earlier summary of the same study https://skeptvet.com/Blog/2020/01/new-evidence-about-when-to-neuter-your-dog/ Personally I would like to see the details (pay wall problem). A one percent increase may be statistically significant but still unimportant in the real world, especially when N is large. I'd also like some evidence that the dogs sampled accurately reflected their breeds. I can imagine, for example, that the difference between field and bench Labs might be greater than the difference between Labs and Goldies. Edited October 24, 2020 by sandgrubber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoofnHoof Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 On 24/10/2020 at 2:42 PM, sandgrubber said: An earlier summary of the same study https://skeptvet.com/Blog/2020/01/new-evidence-about-when-to-neuter-your-dog/ Personally I would like to see the details (pay wall problem). A one percent increase may be statistically significant but still unimportant in the real world, especially when N is large. I'd also like some evidence that the dogs sampled accurately reflected their breeds. I can imagine, for example, that the difference between field and bench Labs might be greater than the difference between Labs and Goldies. I may be able to get the full text I'll have a look when I'm back on the computer. Don't be put off by paywalls though, just email the authors or message them on researchgate and most likely they will send you the full text, they don't get any $ from paywalls. Individual studies are rarely likely to provide a definitive answer, they just add to the existing body of knowledge to help inform. Sometimes media grabs leave out all the caveats that the scientists discuss in the paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogsAndTheMob Posted October 31, 2020 Share Posted October 31, 2020 I was able to see full text and supplementary data by clicking on the Present Study Referenced link at the bottom of the original post. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papillon Kisses Posted October 31, 2020 Share Posted October 31, 2020 Also interesting https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0196284 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now