Boronia Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Nightmare over for dog owners as council rules out appeal http://www.gympietim...rules-/2705536/ 15th Jul 2015 5:00 AM THE nightmare is over for Denmark Hill's Thomas family with council accepting the umpire's decision to release their dog Bruce. In a turnaround to comments made to the QT on Monday, Ipswich City Council Community Safety Committee chairman Andrew Antoniolli yesterday dismissed appealing a Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) ruling to overturn a destruction order on the dog. Cr Antoniolli said the ruling did not present any dangerous precedent in relation to future attacks and incidents. "Therefore council has decided not to pursue any appeal in relation to the outcome of this matter and accepts the QCAT ruling," Cr Antoniolli said. "The ruling outlined a number of unique circumstances in this matter and council is confident none will impact on our continued efforts to act in relation to dangerous dogs." In overturning the destruction order, the QCAT panel noted that "Bruce had been managed in a way consistent with community expectations for keeping dangerous dogs". "It is not a situation where the Thomas' failed to keep Bruce enclosed," the panel ruled. "He did not leave his enclosure and attack a person in the street. Bruce bit a person who entered the area in which he was enclosed, in disregard of extensive signage, prior warning, and internally fenced areas." "There is no suggestion since the dangerous dog declaration that Bruce has at any time escaped the area in which he has been enclosed, thereby posing a risk to community health and safety." Kev and Chris Thomas have been reunited with their dog, Bruce. Photo: Rob Williams / The Queensland Times Rob Williams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogbesotted Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 thank the Dog Gods and common sense. H Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melzawelza Posted July 15, 2015 Share Posted July 15, 2015 (edited) Sounds like common sense prevailed. Obviously the enclosure requirements for DD must be less stringent in QLD than in NSW - in NSW the dog has to be in a roofed run fixed to sealed graded concrete, with a lock on it. NSW is complete, ridiculous, overkill though. Edited July 15, 2015 by melzawelza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christina Posted July 16, 2015 Share Posted July 16, 2015 They should have charged the person with trespassing. What an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now