sandgrubber Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 (edited) There was discussion of a similar case a few months back. Though people may be interested that at least one vet got prosecuted . . . by the vet board . . . for this offense. http://www.veterinarypracticenews.com/Texas-Suspends-Vets-License-for-5-Years/ Texas Suspends Vet’s License for 5 Years Dr. Millard L. Tierce draws a five-year suspension for not following through on euthanasia orders and for violating other veterinary standards. BY KEN NIEDZIELA, NEWS EDITOR Published: 2014.10.22 01:03 PM Dr. Millard L. Tierce III sits in the audience during a meeting Tuesday of the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners. KXAS-TV Texas veterinarian Millard L. Tierce III, DVM, has lost his license for five years over allegations that included failing to euthanize four patients as promised and keeping a dog alive for use as a blood donor. The Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners approved a settlement with Dr. Tierce during a meeting Tuesday in Austin. Tierce, who attended the meeting but did not testify, agreed to the license suspension Oct. 1 and waived a formal disciplinary hearing. The board found that Tierce violated seven state rules covering everything from standards of care and clinic sanitation to patient recordkeeping and the security of controlled substances. Tierce, 71, will be allowed to continue owning and managing his hospital, Camp Bowie Animal Clinic in Fort Worth, while other practitioners tend to patients. Marian Harris, who erroneously thought her dog Sid had been euthanized at Camp Bowie, pleaded with the board to revoke Tierce’s license rather than suspend it. “What is going to be the deterrent to prevent future atrocities like the ones to which he has already confessed to from happening in the future?” she asked. “A suspension still allows Dr. Tierce to daily visit his clinic under the guise of administrative duties.” See link above for full story. Edited November 2, 2014 by sandgrubber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VizslaMomma Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 It's the same dog involved. Horrific in that he got monetary gain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuralPug Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 That board must be an old boys' network. Repeated breached of basic sanitation and lack of duty of care, even without the lying to owners of patients and abuse of his position, should mean that he is banned from running that clinic - but he is allowed to manage it, just not practice as a vet? Unless they are going to run very frequent hygiene control and health standard checks, he should NOT have been permitted to continue managing that clinic. Suspending him from clinical duties is insufficient. Two or more of the defrauded owners are taking him to court - I hope they succeed in hitting his hip pocket at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VizslaMomma Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 That board must be an old boys' network. I lived not far from that area. You hit the nail on the head about the old boys' network. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loving my Oldies Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 The topic title needs to be changed. He wasn't suspended for not PTS-ing dogs when he should have do so; there were numerous other offences. His licence should be cancelled permanently. The man is 71 - say he graduated at 25, that makes nearly 50 years of god knows how much cruelty by intention and/or neglect and/or arrogance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercedes Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 OMG that is disgusting. Should never be allowed near animals or his practice again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_PL_ Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 :mad What an old turd. original story with photos http://www.9news.com.au/world/2014/05/01/11/08/vet-kept-dog-alive-for-blood-transfusions?mch=mobilenh&mchpost=pos3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandgrubber Posted November 2, 2014 Author Share Posted November 2, 2014 The topic title needs to be changed. He wasn't suspended for not PTS-ing dogs when he should have do so; there were numerous other offences. done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Vets used to be seen to be above most others of the population and regarded as being ethical and all the rest . Then you have a good look at how many exploit animals and do all manner of things including being some of the biggest puppy farmers in the country and you start to question how you can tell the good from the rotten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now