huck house Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/deathrow-mylo-so-docile-he-could-be-therapy-dog-20140604-39ihc.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hankdog Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 (edited) Can't find the Facebook page. Must be a wealthy council if this is the best use of their money. I'd be spewing if my council spent my rates money this way. Edited June 5, 2014 by hankdog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amax-1 Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 Unfortunately the dog's temperament isn't the basis of law, it's the perceived breed that governs seizure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
korbin13 Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 This is an update. Not sure what appealing to Peter Walsh is going to achieve, but they obviously know better than me! So much wasted time and money. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/fate-of-deathrow-dog-mylo-in-hands-of-state-government-says-lawyer-20140605-39kxt.html Lawyers for the owners of a dog deemed a dangerous breed have asked the state government to step in to save the dog from death row, where it has been for more than two years.A hearing was to begin on Thursday before the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) to decide the fate of the dog, but did not proceed after lawyer Alysha Tuziak told the court she was seeking a ministerial reprieve for three-year-old Mylo. Ms Tuziak has sent a letter to the Minister for Primary Industries, Peter Walsh, applying to have Mylo exempted from the different restricted breed dog provisions of the Domestic Animals Act 1994. Under the act, the governor in council has the power to intervene. Ms Tuziak told Fairfax Media that the decision on whether Mylo lived or died was now in the government's hands. She said Mylo's owners, 13-year-old Brodie Gray and her mother Jessica, had been struggling to cope with the long legal battle to try to save Mylo. "It's a very stressful and difficult situation for them, particularly when they are only allowed to see Mylo for half an hour every week," Ms Tuziak said. The scheduled VCAT hearing on Thursday was going to be the fifth separate legal hearing to determine if Mylo should be put down. Mylo has been held at the Lost Dogs Home in North Melbourne since May 8, 2012, after escaping from the family's Sunshine West home and being seized by a Brimbank City Council officer. The "Stop them from killing Mylo" Facebook page now has more than 7400 "likes" and Jessica Gray has twice taken her case on appeal to the Supreme Court and won after VCAT repeatedly ordered Mylo be put down. Supreme Court Justice Jack Rush upheld Mrs Gray's latest appeal in February, ordering Brimbank council pay the legal costs of the hearing and that the case return to VCAT for the third time. Brimbank council has been determined to destroy Mylo, claiming the dog is a restricted breed pit bull terrier. It has agreed not to put Mylo down until a final decision is made by the government. Mrs Gray claims DNA tests she paid for in the US proved Mylo was an American Staffordshire terrier cross, not a pit bull. Her lawyer's letter to Mr Walsh included a report from Geelong veterinarian Jack Ayerbe, who examined Mylo and concluded the dog could not be declared an American pit bull terrier. Mr Ayerbe said Mylo complied with less than three of the conformation criteria and less than 10 of the physical characteristics criteria of a pit bull. And a report by dog behavioural expert Jean-Claude Bertoni claims Mylo had such a docile temperament it could be a therapy dog used in hospitals and nursing homes. Mrs Gray says she will never give up fighting for Mylo, and has even offered to move interstate with the dog, but Brimbank council has rejected the offer. There have been claims Brimbank council has spent more than $100,000 in legal fees trying to have Mylo put down. Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/fate-of-deathrow-dog-mylo-in-hands-of-state-government-says-lawyer-20140605-39kxt.html#ixzz33laIeth4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
korbin13 Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 Unfortunately the dog's temperament isn't the basis of law, it's the perceived breed that governs seizure. Yes, that is true. Nothing wrong with fighting for what you believe in. Bad law is bad law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staffyluv Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Can't find the Facebook page. Must be a wealthy council if this is the best use of their money. I'd be spewing if my council spent my rates money this way. Here you go My link This story is everything that is wrong with BSL.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amax-1 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Unfortunately the dog's temperament isn't the basis of law, it's the perceived breed that governs seizure. Yes, that is true. Nothing wrong with fighting for what you believe in. Bad law is bad law. The problem is, it's like having a cannabis plant growing in your front garden. Whether or not they are aware of the cannabis plant's legality or if the intention of the plant is not for the cultivation of drugs doesn't matter in law as the onus is on the person growing the cannabis plant to find out what can be planted in compliance with law. The same applies with restricted breeds, that is the APBT is a restricted breed so when buying a dog/puppy, the onus is on the buyer to comply with the relevant laws by finding out before hand what breeds are restricted. Buying Amstaff type Bull cross breeds that could be perceived as restricted breeds is not a very informed purchase that could sadly result in dramatic consequence for the dog and the owners. The APBT has suffered breed restriction since 1992 and in terms of crossbreeds, it's no different to some countries laws on wolf hybrids, that is you don't by GSD or Husky type crossbreeds that could be perceived as wolf ancestry by appearance as the same thing with seizure results there as it can here with APBT appearance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
persephone Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 poor dog spending 2 yrs at TLDH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Gifts Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Absolutely ludicrous and yet again the one to suffer is an innocent dog. Oh and rate payers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hankdog Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 That's what I would struggle with the most. Having a dog in a pound environment for so long. If the dog still has a good temperament it must be an angel. It must be hell on the young owner. Thanks for the link, liked and shared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now