Jump to content

Ruby Needs Your Help


ruthless
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

WE WON!!!

The declaration will be revoked in the morning and she'll be allowed to be assessed (not sure yet if breed and temp or just temp). She's not out of the woods yet, but we've got her over the first hurdle.

Update on Team Dog's page.

Huge thanks to everyone that signed and shared. You rock! :rock:

Thanks for bringing this to the attention of people who care.

That facebook link did not work for me. I would like to join this group, if possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The gem in the report about Ruby:

She was found playing with the children at the local primary school.

Sweet , sociable dog, safe with children. All that condemned her was a label someone guessed at, based on her appearance. Another person's guess could be entirely different.

The insanity of BSL.

Good on all fighting for her. :thumbsup:

Edited by mita
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's important not to focus on what breed she may or may not be. The fact is she's an innocent dog that's no threat to society who has spent three weeks in a council pound entirely because of the colour of her nose.

Here's Mel's speech from tonight which sums it up so well:

Team Dog started a campaign regarding a dog named Ruby after contact from Ruby’s owners Friday afternoon just gone. We met Ruby and her family Saturday morning and launched her campaign 9pm Sunday night. Her petition has already gathered almost 6 thousand signatures.

The huge response to this campaign highlights the community’s expectation for fair and successful animal management programs. Endless studies around the world have shown that banning or restricting breeds or types of dog is completely unsuccessful in reducing dog attack rates or severity, and in fact often causes them to rise.

Ruby’s case is a perfect example of why. This legislation is both over and under inclusive. Significant amounts of precious Council Ranger resources and wages are spent targeting dogs that would never have caused a problem, leaving significantly less resources for dealing with dogs of other appearances that actually are displaying nuisance or aggressive behaviour in the community.

We do have BSL in place here in NSW and while it is here Councils must work within the legislative framework provided to them. Team Dog has never and will never ask any Council to act in contradiction of the Companion Animals Act or the guidelines. We do, however, strongly advocate that Councils must use every legal option available to them to ensure that good dogs owned by good people are kept with their owners, regardless of their breed or appearance. We could argue that the community also holds this expectation judging by the incredible response to our campaign.

This is why we call upon the Hills Shire Council to utilise their ability to revoke the declaration on Ruby under section 10.9 of the guidelines on the functions of the Companion Animals Act. There is precedent already set for this by Blacktown Council only in December last year.

Section 10.9 states that after revocation the dog MUST be then re-issued with a notice of intention, to allow it to be breed and temperament assessed, as she should have been back in 2011. Ruby’s family, the Council, the vet that are holding her and Team Dog all believe strongly that Ruby will pass any temperament test administered. There is no requirement for the microchipped owner to submit a request for the revocation, or any evidence as to the dog’s breed. This action is only in relation to section 10.8, which covers a dog that may have been incorrectly microchipped as a restricted breed, but has not been through the Notice of Intention process that Ruby has. Ruby was declared as a Cross-breed, meaning she would not be a restricted dog if she passed a temperament test.

Team Dog would like to respectfully and sincerely urge the Hills Shire Council to exercise their ability to revoke Ruby’s declaration, to allow her, and her beautiful family, a second chance. Her, and their, fate lies in your hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's Mel's speech from tonight which sums it up so well:

Blooming brilliant speech. Great point how sending rangers hunting after dogs based on appearance, diverts dog management away from actual behaviours which put community safety at risk.

It's as stupid as giving police officers a list of physical attributes to concentrate on, in order to haul humans off to jail.

May Ruby win through!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...