Jump to content

Police Shoot Dog In Act


Salukifan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ms Flanery said staff had also assessed the dog, which does not have a history with domestic animal services, as well as its enclosure.

“We’ve done a fence inspection and there are some areas where we’ve asked the owner to improve the safety of the fence,” she said

Its a bit late trying to close the gate after the bull/dog has bolted.

Council should have checked the fences as soon as the dog was registered.

One day Councils will do the job they're paid for.

You're assuming the dog is registered. "Does not have a history with domestic animal services" could mean exactly that. It's not known to DAS because it isn't registered, rather than it isn't known to DAS because it has never attacked anyone before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ms Flanery said staff had also assessed the dog, which does not have a history with domestic animal services, as well as its enclosure.

“We’ve done a fence inspection and there are some areas where we’ve asked the owner to improve the safety of the fence,” she said

Its a bit late trying to close the gate after the bull/dog has bolted.

Council should have checked the fences as soon as the dog was registered.

One day Councils will do the job they're paid for.

You're assuming the dog is registered. "Does not have a history with domestic animal services" could mean exactly that. It's not known to DAS because it isn't registered, rather than it isn't known to DAS because it has never attacked anyone before.

Seriously, you're kidding. Right??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ms Flanery said staff had also assessed the dog, which does not have a history with domestic animal services, as well as its enclosure.

“We’ve done a fence inspection and there are some areas where we’ve asked the owner to improve the safety of the fence,” she said

Its a bit late trying to close the gate after the bull/dog has bolted.

Council should have checked the fences as soon as the dog was registered.

One day Councils will do the job they're paid for.

You're assuming the dog is registered. "Does not have a history with domestic animal services" could mean exactly that. It's not known to DAS because it isn't registered, rather than it isn't known to DAS because it has never attacked anyone before.

Seriously, you're kidding. Right??

What is wrong with what j wrote, sounds entirely possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the police offcers should have confronted and bitten the dog rather than shoot at it, apparently like to like is acceptable rather than force in the other thread

And the people being attacked harden up, grow some balls. Right Jed?

Absolutely - if they had been real people, they would have bashed the dog to death with their handbags, chewed on its legs with a cuppa, and cut the hide off to resole their shoes.

Maybe time for you to appreciate that people can have differing opinions to you, and you should to respect and appreciate them, rather than appearing very juvenile and immature. :)

I can remember when some on here had your attitude towards pitbulls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure I know how this one goes according to the owner, first time he has ever escaped and would never hurt a fly.

Yep. Different faces, different places, same shiet.

yep, well said Reverend Jo and Rocketeer

I was told the dogs that attacked me were "lovely dogs, very friendly, they've never done anything like this before (implying me or my dog provoked them), the owners have guinea pigs (comparing my Shihtzu to a guinea pig) and they've never hurt them" :mad:mad

Yep same shite different day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Follow up report:

Police are yet to lay any charges over a vicious dog attack in Canberra's north that left three people injured.

Officers were forced to shoot the “highly aggressive” dog, which survived and was recovering at home after surgery on Wednesday.

A woman was bailed up by the tan dog, believed to be a mastiff cross ridgeback, while in a dog park on Tuesday evening in Dunlop.

A man who went to the woman's aid was bitten, as was a 17-year-old boy who had his clothing ripped as the dog tried to bite him.

Advertisement Acting Belconnen Station Sergeant Carolyn Uhe said police received three separate reports on the attacks before arriving on the scene shortly before 6pm.

She said an officer had lured the animal away from nearby members of the public before firing three shots.

“The dog was highly aggressive and actually confronted police,” she said.

“As a result, unfortunately the dog was shot by police.”

Sergeant Uhe said other options such as capsicum spray were considered by the officer before he discharged his weapon, but she said it was an appropriate response that did not risk any nearby members of the public.

“There was no risk at all,” she said.

“They were well away. The angle of the discharge was only two metres or so.”

Police have spoken with the owner, who cannot explain how the dog escaped the nearby backyard, and Territory and Municipal Services have taken over the investigation.

Director of city services Fleur Flanery said domestic animal services were working with the police, but they could not yet confirm if the animal would be destroyed.

“It’s not appropriate at the moment to take that dog,” she said.

Ms Flanery said staff had also assessed the dog, which does not have a history with domestic animal services, as well as its enclosure.

“We’ve done a fence inspection and there are some areas where we’ve asked the owner to improve the safety of the fence,” she said.

Ms Flanery said there were a range of infringements that could be issued in a similar situation, but nothing could be confirmed until the investigation was final. No expected date for its finalisation could be provided.

The incident has shocked Dunlop residents, one of which described the area as home to many young families.

“It’s certainly a one-off,” he said.

“This is a great area. Most people have little ‘pookie’ dogs. I don’t know where that dog came from.”

Another man told Fairfax Media he didn’t even hear any gunshots, despite being at home at the time of the incident.

An ACT Policing spokeswoman said the last incident involving such attacks was in 2010, when authorities were forced to destroy two dogs after a series of attacks.

The dog should have been PTS immediately, next time it mysteriously escapes it could attack a child. Might is right as usual.

:mad:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ms Flanery said staff had also assessed the dog, which does not have a history with domestic animal services, as well as its enclosure.

“We’ve done a fence inspection and there are some areas where we’ve asked the owner to improve the safety of the fence,” she said

Its a bit late trying to close the gate after the bull/dog has bolted.

Council should have checked the fences as soon as the dog was registered.

One day Councils will do the job they're paid for.

You're assuming the dog is registered. "Does not have a history with domestic animal services" could mean exactly that. It's not known to DAS because it isn't registered, rather than it isn't known to DAS because it has never attacked anyone before.

Seriously, you're kidding. Right??

Why would I be kidding? I've read the same sentence you have and have interpreted it a different way to you. Surprisingly enough, many people don't bother to register their dogs. If they are well behaved dogs that don't come to notice for any reason, why would DAS even know that the dog exists? Until such time as it does come to their attention for some misdemeanour, it doesn't have a history with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The police deserve commendation. You need to remember they tend to get 'bitten' by public reaction when they shoot an animal.

Although odds are good that the owner was irresponsible, and the dog was obviously a hazard, we don't know.

The police pushed this into a process of law, and that's what should happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The police deserve commendation. You need to remember they tend to get 'bitten' by public reaction when they shoot an animal.

Although odds are good that the owner was irresponsible, and the dog was obviously a hazard, we don't know.

The police pushed this into a process of law, and that's what should happen.

The police do a tough job at the best of times, they have to stop situations getting worse any way they can, if someone's dog is going on a rampage and gets shot, the dog owners only have themselves to blame. I've been told in some instances pepper spray meant for humans does not work very well on dogs, in which case it's shoot or get bitten for the police on the spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...