MelissaS Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 This article and another I read said he ... was banned from keeping a dog. Thanks for that info, Mel. That article also said the dogs were found with the body. So they mustn't have challenged whoever did it. I wonder if the dogs knew him/them. Like an associate of the bloke. Also didn't seem to have a grudge against the dogs.... left them unharmed. I agree with Mrs RB ... may have been about something else entirely. One of the dogs was found alive but paralysed with his body such a strange and awful story all round. Very disturbing that an individual could be like this and the end result is awful too. It's very telling that an entire town won't talk. I really wonder whose dogs they were too and when and how that dog became paralysed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelissaS Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 Sorry I have no idea how I quoted myself like that??! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirislin Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 I wonder wildlife he had and what he was doing with it. I'm glad he wasn't my neighbour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogbesotted Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 I hope the paralysed dog recieved immediate veterinary attention. my thoughts as well. H Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megan_ Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 A SUSPENDED jail sentence and $15k fines after conviction for three counts of GBH for setting his dogs on people. Sounds like those weren't his only offenses either. AND they let him keep the dogs! You gotta be kidding! If the legal system had given this bastard what he deserves, he'd still be alive today . . . in jail . . . but still breathing. Murder is wrong. But I can see why the townspeople might be protecting the murderer, if that's what is happening. yes - taht should be the true story. How on earth was someone allowed to own dogs that he repeatedly used to attack people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mita Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 such a strange and awful story all round. You're sure right there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackJaq Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 sometimes, you reap what you sow. Hmmm I agree with this. This. No pity from me, except for his animals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alyosha Posted July 29, 2013 Author Share Posted July 29, 2013 yes - taht should be the true story. How on earth was someone allowed to own dogs that he repeatedly used to attack people? He wasn't allowed to have dogs, he had a court order banning him from owning them. Sounds like he possibly wasn't the most likely person to abide by rules and orders... And he had dogs anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now