Loving my Oldies Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 The resolution for the individual was appropriate in our opinon. I'm not going to outline any more, I understand people are curious, I would be too if I were you. However you'll just have to trust me when I say it was appropriate. This after all was between GDRR NSW and one person (representing PR) - it wasn't rescue in general against PR's - although since posting have come to realise how much PR is in the headlines. If other people have issues with Pound Rounds I suggest they take a stand where possible and go after their own resolutions. I understand this can be difficult sometimes and impossible sometimes as well, our situation was individual to us - between us and one individual - the circumstance was unique as such and that is why a resolution via our Lawyer was possible. I wasn't being curious and "looking for the blood on the ground". It was simply because, as you said, there are apparently huge issues with Pound Rounds, and not all of the people who deal with them have your strength and initiative. In the past when I was helping rescue groups, I've had to deal with crackpots, too, I've been threatened with legal action, screamed down the phone at, etc etc. It is never pleasant, but some people are able to deal with more easily and/or effectively than others. I was merely trying to be a voice for those people who maybe don't have the support or experience to, as you have suggested, to take a stand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loving my Oldies Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 The resolution for the individual was appropriate in our opinon. I'm not going to outline any more, I understand people are curious, I would be too if I were you. However you'll just have to trust me when I say it was appropriate. This after all was between GDRR NSW and one person (representing PR) - it wasn't rescue in general against PR's. If other people have issues with Pound Rounds I suggest they take a stand where possible and go after their own resolutions. I understand this can be difficult sometimes and impossible as well, our situation was individual to us - between us and one individual - the circumstance was unique as such and that is why a resolution via our Lawyer was possible. well said This response seems to be a criticism of my suggestion for more information. Please see my response to SAS's post. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelpiecuddles Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Maybe if there is someone who genuinely has need to dsicuss due to an actual existing similiar situation they are currently dealing with they could pm Sas privately. I don't see any benefit in outing it all publicly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loving my Oldies Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Maybe if there is someone who genuinely has need to dsicuss due to an actual existing similiar situation they are currently dealing with they could pm Sas privately. I don't see any benefit in outing it all publicly. I was thinking that too, but how will they know if this thread is deleted? Rather SAS could have suggested anyone wanting to discuss their situation and try to have it resolved could PM her, and ask for the thread to be closed for further discussion, but still be available for those who need assistance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelpiecuddles Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 True but there also aren't many DOLers who aren't aware of it now anyway LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panto Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 DD it's not a criticism at you or anyone else curious about the outcome. "well said" means just that, a diplomatic response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_PL_ Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 I'm glad there has been a civilised outcome. If anyone is wondering why groups are told in these exchanges that they are responsible for dogs dying...... Names removed to protect groups 'outed' in this gem.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loving my Oldies Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 True but there also aren't many DOLers who aren't aware of it now anyway LOL There are new people always joining :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sas Posted May 16, 2013 Author Share Posted May 16, 2013 The resolution for the individual was appropriate in our opinon. I'm not going to outline any more, I understand people are curious, I would be too if I were you. However you'll just have to trust me when I say it was appropriate. This after all was between GDRR NSW and one person (representing PR) - it wasn't rescue in general against PR's - although since posting have come to realise how much PR is in the headlines. If other people have issues with Pound Rounds I suggest they take a stand where possible and go after their own resolutions. I understand this can be difficult sometimes and impossible sometimes as well, our situation was individual to us - between us and one individual - the circumstance was unique as such and that is why a resolution via our Lawyer was possible. I wasn't being curious and "looking for the blood on the ground". It was simply because, as you said, there are apparently huge issues with Pound Rounds, and not all of the people who deal with them have your strength and initiative. In the past when I was helping rescue groups, I've had to deal with crackpots, too, I've been threatened with legal action, screamed down the phone at, etc etc. It is never pleasant, but some people are able to deal with more easily and/or effectively than others. I was merely trying to be a voice for those people who maybe don't have the support or experience to, as you have suggested, to take a stand. I wasn't suggesting you were looking for blood - I'm just explaining to anyone interested where I stand personally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loving my Oldies Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 DD it's not a criticism at you or anyone else curious about the outcome. "well said" means just that, a diplomatic response. Well, it sure sounds it. As I said, I wasn't being curious. The issue has being resolved satisfactorily for SAS. I was merely trying to get the message across that others might benefit from her experience, but apparently that is being undiplomatic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelpiecuddles Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Inthe case of legal action there may be reasons other than Sas's preference why details can't be discussed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sas Posted May 16, 2013 Author Share Posted May 16, 2013 Maybe if there is someone who genuinely has need to dsicuss due to an actual existing similiar situation they are currently dealing with they could pm Sas privately. I don't see any benefit in outing it all publicly. I was thinking that too, but how will they know if this thread is deleted? Rather SAS could have suggested anyone wanting to discuss their situation and try to have it resolved could PM her, and ask for the thread to be closed for further discussion, but still be available for those who need assistance. This situation has been wide spread on FB as well as the thread here. I'm not sure there are many rescuers who have an online presence who haven't heard about it. Because a resolution has been achieved there is no need to carry on - there is another PR's thread I believe where people can vent there. I'm more than happy to speak to anyone who would like advice but in reality it was our Lawyer who decided to take it further - I simply put it out there given the content was so extreme it wasn't just a petty email exchange. Although I am an assertive blunt person I don't feel the need to keep tormenting this particular person as the outcome has as I said been appropriate and I highly doubt they will ever communicate in that manner again - in brief...punishment has been given and there is no need to keep punishing them. I cannot speak for PR's themselves but perhaps this has been a lesson for them as well about how their people communicate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sas Posted May 16, 2013 Author Share Posted May 16, 2013 DD it's not a criticism at you or anyone else curious about the outcome. "well said" means just that, a diplomatic response. Well, it sure sounds it. As I said, I wasn't being curious. The issue has being resolved satisfactorily for SAS. I was merely trying to get the message across that others might benefit from her experience, but apparently that is being undiplomatic. I think you may be mis-interpreting. I understand and appreciate where you are coming from, anyone is free to contact me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sas Posted May 16, 2013 Author Share Posted May 16, 2013 On that note, that is all I'm going to be saying on this thread, thank you everyone for your information and your support, it's been an interesting few days. I hope the actions of our lawyer have maybe given you some courage to also make a stand where appropriate, I know some of you aren't in that position - all one can do is....what they can do. I am available to contact via PM or [email protected] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackJaq Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Just for clarity's sake, I was the one who said I was curious. And I was. No offence intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mita Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Although I am an assertive blunt person I don't feel the need to keep tormenting this particular person as the outcome has as I said been appropriate and I highly doubt they will ever communicate in that manner again - in brief...punishment has been given and there is no need to keep punishing them. I cannot speak for PR's themselves but perhaps this has been a lesson for them as well about how their people communicate. You got the outburst dealt with, as it deserved, by consulting your lawyer. Your comment above is decent & rational. I dips my lid to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dame Aussie Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Good work sas. It's nice to know these kinds of people don't always get away with such atrocious behaviour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now