This Is Just Wrong On So Many Levels!

[Nic.B]

I didn't see 5 vicious dogs repeatedly attacking a man.

I saw one dog tugging on the man's shirt or jacket, and several times the dog who was behind and was wagging its tail, nosed the man's hand.

There may be other footage, but it doesn't excuse DOL becoming as sensationalist as the media which just repeats the error.

Here we go. Media beat up.

Frankly, I find it hard to not get passionate about someone being bailed up by several large dogs. Hard to imagine a much more terrifying situation.

What a shame the man wasn't mauled to death, then maybe it would be worth getting a bit heated and passionate about it, hey?

Why don't you try it and see how you fare.

Good point but not admissible in Court based on the evidence presented here.

It could have been set up.

Maybe he hurt his arm somewhere else, knew the dogs, and is stiching someone up to pay the costs.

Lol,

Now where is the sensationalism??

Seriously leave it alone Hun

[Nic.B]

I didn't see 5 vicious dogs repeatedly attacking a man.

I saw one dog tugging on the man's shirt or jacket, and several times the dog who was behind and was wagging its tail, nosed the man's hand.

There may be other footage, but it doesn't excuse DOL becoming as sensationalist as the media which just repeats the error.

Yikes!

[Rocketeer]

I didn't see 5 vicious dogs repeatedly attacking a man.

I saw one dog tugging on the man's shirt or jacket, and several times the dog who was behind and was wagging its tail, nosed the man's hand.

There may be other footage, but it doesn't excuse DOL becoming as sensationalist as the media which just repeats the error.

Here we go. Media beat up.

Frankly, I find it hard to not get passionate about someone being bailed up by several large dogs. Hard to imagine a much more terrifying situation.

What a shame the man wasn't mauled to death, then maybe it would be worth getting a bit heated and passionate about it, hey?

Why don't you try it and see how you fare.

Good point but not admissible in Court based on the evidence presented here.

It could have been set up.

Maybe he hurt his arm somewhere else, knew the dogs, and is stiching someone up to pay the costs.

Lol,

Now where is the sensationalism??

Seriously leave it alone Hun

lol. Just agreeing with OP's comment about sensationalism on DOL.

[Dame Aussie]

I hope those who were supposedly "in control" of the dogs (supposedly taking them for a walk) are prosecuted as well...

Seriously though, it's kinda funny how many of us are saying that they wouldn't try to assist for fear of themselves being injured... I wonder how many of us would feel the same about others witnessing one of us being attacked like this and not trying to help?

Much as I'd hate to bear the brunt of a well aimed AmStaff bite (or a few bites) - I simply couldn't stand by and just "witness" another human being taking that sort of attack from FOUR large AmStaffs... if I could divert the attention of even ONE of them, that would be better than standing by, filming it on my phone, and essentially letting it carry on.

T.

Me neither. May be stupid but I would have at least tried to get them off him. I wouldn;t judge someone for not helping though if they were frightened.

Agree the son could have done something too, instead of just listen to soemone screaming and then judge others for doing what he did!