Over Flowing Rspca Gympie

[Sheridan]

Okay, we're up to six dogs not adopted from the RSPCA. I'm sure we'll manage to find some more.

[Boronia]

Is there any reason not to adopt from RSPCA? especially if they have a dog that would suit your needs very well. Surely the idea is to save a dog from rescue rather than boycott the rescue because you don't agree with their policies.

I don't agree with the RSPCA's policies and don't like them one bit, but, if I were looking for a dog to adopt and they had a Westie, or Scottish Terrier for sale I would be first in line.

I wouldn't cut off my nose to spite my face...I would get that dog regardless...one dog saved and one happy owner!

eta the 'e' in the word 'spite' :laugh:

Edited April 28, 2013 by Boronia

[Sheridan]

Is there any reason not to adopt from RSPCA? especially if they have a dog that would suit your needs very well. Surely the idea is to save a dog from rescue rather than boycott the rescue because you don't agree with their policies.

I don't agree with the RSPCA's policies and don't like them one bit, but, if I were looking for a dog to adopt and they had a Westie, or Scottish Terrier for sale I would be first in line.

I wouldn't cut off my nose to spit my face...I would get that dog regardless...one dog saved and one happy owner!

Im pretty sure I'd be the same, Boronia. I don't donate to the RSPCA but if they had a dog that suited me, why should I give that dog a miss? It doesn't hurt the RSPCA if people don't adopt. As has been noted, they have plenty of money and if no one adopts then it only hurts the dogs. Blind hatred tends to blind.

[Steve]

Is there any reason not to adopt from RSPCA? especially if they have a dog that would suit your needs very well. Surely the idea is to save a dog from rescue rather than boycott the rescue because you don't agree with their policies.

I don't agree with the RSPCA's policies and don't like them one bit, but, if I were looking for a dog to adopt and they had a Westie, or Scottish Terrier for sale I would be first in line.

I wouldn't cut off my nose to spit my face...I would get that dog regardless...one dog saved and one happy owner!

Im pretty sure I'd be the same, Boronia. I don't donate to the RSPCA but if they had a dog that suited me, why should I give that dog a miss? It doesn't hurt the RSPCA if people don't adopt. As has been noted, they have plenty of money and if no one adopts then it only hurts the dogs. Blind hatred tends to blind.

Agreed.

[tarope]

Being involved with the RSPCA is the worst accusation tarope can think of making.

As I said...I could be wrong.

Tarope, what I am a supporter of is logic and truth, rather than ridiculous hysteria. Here is logic: one dog that you got from a rescue group is not evidence of people no longer adopting dogs from the RSPCA. Logic, try it. Your accusation that I am an RSPCA supporter is, as usual, when you are unable to prove your claim, simply meant to deflect attention from you. If you have evidence that people are abandoning the RSPCA then post it. Can't be that hard.

The fact that the R$PCA is crying foul that people are going elsewhere to buy dogs is in itself prof enough...don't you think. :D

Ah, tarope, just keep on being hilarious.

What else can I say.

Don't waste your breath Tarope.

Four out of the five dogs in my block of units all came from rescue, none from the RSPCA. The fifth one was adopted by a lady who's friend passed away, who took her in rather than have her being PTS.

Yes I know mantis, I just can't put my finger on it...whether sheridan hates rescue dogs or gets a commission from the R$PCA for dogs sold.

[Are You Serious Jo]

So that's what you think, that every person who doesn't automatically believe everything they read on FB must be working for the rspca or hates rescue dogs? Really?

[Sheridan]

So that's what you think, that every person who doesn't automatically believe everything they read on FB must be working for the rspca or hates rescue dogs? Really?

Given both mantis and tarope have now accused me of working for, supporting, getting a bung from the RSPCA, I'd suggest there's some PMing going on. It's designed to distract.

[tdierikx]

Isn't it funny/telling when those who are not getting their own way in threads like these feel that they have to accuse others of being in bed with the object of their intense dislike?

Sheridan is a proven supporter of ethical and reputable rescue, so to accuse her of having some bias that goes against that is only showing the ignorance and frustration of those who cannot back up their own arguments with actual facts to prove their points.

Comments like "whether Sheridan hates rescue dogs or gets a commission from the R$PCA for dogs sold" are uncalled for, and only show those posting such as ignorant and desperate to score a point below the belt - and do nothing to further their own arguments on the topic.

T.

[Steve]

Yes happens all the time whenever you try to objectively look at proposed legislation for breeders too = .Id like $5 for every time Ive been accused of supporting or promoting puppy farmers when I try to talk about un intended consequences in legislation for breeders or if I dont instantly believe something thats being touted in the media and hold judgement ot challenge what has been said.

The fact is whether someone supports or works for what someone sees as the bad guys it shouldn't make any difference anyway.

When ever you go after the man and not the ball all it does is stop debate and prevent others from being able to see both sides and make informed opinions.

Even if Sheridan was guilty of what she is being accused of and in all honesty its one of the silliest things to think of her she would still have the right to say what she thinks without being accused and attacked personally.

If you keep playing the ball and not the man the umpire will send you off.

[skelp2]

Perhaps many people in Gympie are not in a position to adopt an animal, given that they have had quite disastrous flooding both this year and last, if memory serves me correctly. If you have lost your home, are renting temporary accommodation or are still waiting on repairs to your home and fencing, the last thing you would do is add a pet, surely?

[tarope]

So that's what you think, that every person who doesn't automatically believe everything they read on FB must be working for the rspca or hates rescue dogs? Really?

Given both mantis and tarope have now accused me of working for, supporting, getting a bung from the RSPCA, I'd suggest there's some PMing going on. It's designed to distract.

It was a joke sheridan, you told me to keep being hilarious didn't you...can't you take a joke ? I didn't get upset with your comments about rescue dogs that mantis and I have. You can accuse me of supporting the R$PCA if you like...now that would be hilarious. :D

Edited April 29, 2013 by tarope

[Boronia]

Isn't it funny/telling when those who are not getting their own way in threads like these feel that they have to accuse others of being in bed with the object of their intense dislike?

Sheridan is a proven supporter of ethical and reputable rescue, so to accuse her of having some bias that goes against that is only showing the ignorance and frustration of those who cannot back up their own arguments with actual facts to prove their points.

Comments like "whether Sheridan hates rescue dogs or gets a commission from the R$PCA for dogs sold" are uncalled for, and only show those posting such as ignorant and desperate to score a point below the belt - and do nothing to further their own arguments on the topic.

T.

+1

The thought that Sheridan hates rescue dogs or gets commissions is completely laughable.

How about having a factual discussion instead of beating up on posters who may appear to disagree with your beliefs when they are only wanting clarification for comments made.

I understand that the RSPCA's way of doing things is pretty awful but to accuse a Doler of doing a 'crawley-lick-b*m-suck-up' act to them is a bit much.

[Sheridan]

So that's what you think, that every person who doesn't automatically believe everything they read on FB must be working for the rspca or hates rescue dogs? Really?

Given both mantis and tarope have now accused me of working for, supporting, getting a bung from the RSPCA, I'd suggest there's some PMing going on. It's designed to distract.

It was a joke sheridan, you told me to keep being hilarious didn't you...can't you take a joke ? I didn't get upset with your comments about rescue dogs that mantis and I have. You can accuse me of supporting the R$PCA if you like...now that would be hilarious. :D

What comments have I made about your dogs? I don't even know what dogs you have nor do I care. I know mantis' previous dog was Kenny and has had problems with a neighbour regarding the current dog. That's the some total of my knowledge of your dogs and mantis' dogs.

You're backtracking because you've been pinged by other people, that's all.

[Sheridan]

Isn't it funny/telling when those who are not getting their own way in threads like these feel that they have to accuse others of being in bed with the object of their intense dislike?

Sheridan is a proven supporter of ethical and reputable rescue, so to accuse her of having some bias that goes against that is only showing the ignorance and frustration of those who cannot back up their own arguments with actual facts to prove their points.

Comments like "whether Sheridan hates rescue dogs or gets a commission from the R$PCA for dogs sold" are uncalled for, and only show those posting such as ignorant and desperate to score a point below the belt - and do nothing to further their own arguments on the topic.

T.

+1

The thought that Sheridan hates rescue dogs or gets commissions is completely laughable.

How about having a factual discussion instead of beating up on posters who may appear to disagree with your beliefs when they are only wanting clarification for comments made.

I understand that the RSPCA's way of doing things is pretty awful but to accuse a Doler of doing a 'crawley-lick-b*m-suck-up' act to them is a bit much.

Actually, the funny thing is the suggestion that the RSPCA pays bungs to supporters. Can you see that happening? :laugh:

[Are You Serious Jo]

Not with the size of their bank account I can't :laugh:

[tarope]

So that's what you think, that every person who doesn't automatically believe everything they read on FB must be working for the rspca or hates rescue dogs? Really?

Given both mantis and tarope have now accused me of working for, supporting, getting a bung from the RSPCA, I'd suggest there's some PMing going on. It's designed to distract.

It was a joke sheridan, you told me to keep being hilarious didn't you...can't you take a joke ? I didn't get upset with your comments about rescue dogs that mantis and I have. You can accuse me of supporting the R$PCA if you like...now that would be hilarious. :D

What comments have I made about your dogs? I don't even know what dogs you have nor do I care. I know mantis' previous dog was Kenny and has had problems with a neighbour regarding the current dog. That's the some total of my knowledge of your dogs and mantis' dogs.

You're backtracking because you've been pinged by other people, that's all.

So now I'm backtracking you say, I don't care what other people think... what about your rather nasty sarcastic comments about what I said. The mere suggestion that the R$PCA would give money to anyone for anything is hilarious in itself...only you don't see the funny side. :D

[Nic.B]

Have only read the OP and not the thread, though from the last comment I can gather this thread is off track.

I do not like RSPCA (aside from ACT RSPCA, which is fabulous).

There is a good message in the OP in terms of chipping/updating which enables dogs and owners being reunited far more sucesfully. We all know that, unsavy dog owners sadly do not.

What I dont like is the typical "blame the public" statement.

Common sense says if there is a large influx of dogs and cats arriving at the RSPCA, shelters and pounds, it is time to pull something out of the bag (at times) to assist animals in finding great homes.

It involves great marketing; radio, local papers and TV. Offering a free bed, collar and lead, free puppy school or obedience, promote the the benefits of adopting a shelter pet, give families a huge adoption pack filled with all they need to get them started.

Create an open day at the shelter or create an 'adoption drive' over a weekend.

The possibilities are endless.

What really sh*ts me is the fact that the RSPCA (in the OP) are crying poor/foul yet as an org with millions in donations and a huge profile, this is the best they can do?

Reputable small and large rescue orgs are doing an inspirational job and IMO are doing far more for rescued pets in this country than the RSPCA.

[Sheridan]

So that's what you think, that every person who doesn't automatically believe everything they read on FB must be working for the rspca or hates rescue dogs? Really?

Given both mantis and tarope have now accused me of working for, supporting, getting a bung from the RSPCA, I'd suggest there's some PMing going on. It's designed to distract.

It was a joke sheridan, you told me to keep being hilarious didn't you...can't you take a joke ? I didn't get upset with your comments about rescue dogs that mantis and I have. You can accuse me of supporting the R$PCA if you like...now that would be hilarious. :D

What comments have I made about your dogs? I don't even know what dogs you have nor do I care. I know mantis' previous dog was Kenny and has had problems with a neighbour regarding the current dog. That's the some total of my knowledge of your dogs and mantis' dogs.

You're backtracking because you've been pinged by other people, that's all.

So now I'm backtracking you say, I don't care what other people think... what about your rather nasty sarcastic comments about what I said. The mere suggestion that the R$PCA would give money to anyone for anything is hilarious in itself...only you don't see the funny side. :D

So, have I made comments about your and mantis' dogs or not?

[Sheridan]

Have only read the OP and not the thread, though from the last comment I can gather this thread is off track.

I do not like RSPCA (aside from ACT RSPCA, which is fabulous).

There is a good message in the OP in terms of chipping/updating which enables dogs and owners being reunited far more sucesfully. We all know that, unsavy dog owners sadly do not.

What I dont like is the typical "blame the public" statement.

Common sense says if there is a large influx of dogs and cats arriving at the RSPCA, shelters and pounds, it is time to pull something out of the bag (at times) to assist animals in finding great homes.

It involves great marketing; radio, local papers and TV. Offering a free bed, collar and lead, free puppy school or obedience, promote the the benefits of adopting a shelter pet, give families a huge adoption pack filled with all they need to get them started.

Create an open day at the shelter or create an 'adoption drive' over a weekend.

The possibilities are endless.

What really sh*ts me is the fact that the RSPCA (in the OP) are crying poor/foul yet as an org with millions in donations and a huge profile, this is the best they can do?

Reputable small and large rescue orgs are doing an inspirational job and IMO are doing far more for rescued pets in this country than the RSPCA.

Notably, as I've said before, the ACT RSPCA hasn't any money.

[Nic.B]

Have only read the OP and not the thread, though from the last comment I can gather this thread is off track.

I do not like RSPCA (aside from ACT RSPCA, which is fabulous).

There is a good message in the OP in terms of chipping/updating which enables dogs and owners being reunited far more sucesfully. We all know that, unsavy dog owners sadly do not.

What I dont like is the typical "blame the public" statement.

Common sense says if there is a large influx of dogs and cats arriving at the RSPCA, shelters and pounds, it is time to pull something out of the bag (at times) to assist animals in finding great homes.

It involves great marketing; radio, local papers and TV. Offering a free bed, collar and lead, free puppy school or obedience, promote the the benefits of adopting a shelter pet, give families a huge adoption pack filled with all they need to get them started.

Create an open day at the shelter or create an 'adoption drive' over a weekend.

The possibilities are endless.

What really sh*ts me is the fact that the RSPCA (in the OP) are crying poor/foul yet as an org with millions in donations and a huge profile, this is the best they can do?

Reputable small and large rescue orgs are doing an inspirational job and IMO are doing far more for rescued pets in this country than the RSPCA.

Notably, as I've said before, the ACT RSPCA hasn't any money.

Yes, ACT RSPCA resources are poured into the family pets 'in their care' looking for new homes.

RSPCA ACT is a thorn in side of RSPCA in every other state in Aust as ACT do offer rehabilitation, training, socialisation and they address all medical needs. Temp test's are also brilliant as individual circumstance, breed traits and socialisation is taken into consideration.