minimax Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 Excellent! Sad, but expected, that he sees the complaints about him to the media, police and AEC as a result of him being spokesperson, not due to his atrocious behavior, but I'd expect nothing different of someone with an ego of his size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 The thing they forget is that if the complaints have no merit nothing would have happened to him, so he's basically admitting he has done things wrong and got caught. Joan of Mark was really laying it on, still a bunch of contradictions, one post it's all the orders were minor and it took only a days work to be compliant, now it's extensive effort on his part for compliance. I also love how he is supporting the legal team, dream on Mark :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weasels Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 Maybe it wouldn't have taken up quite so much of his time if he wasn't continuously writing essays about how wonderful he is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minimax Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 The thing they forget is that if the complaints have no merit nothing would have happened to him, so he's basically admitting he has done things wrong and got caught. Joan of Mark was really laying it on, still a bunch of contradictions, one post it's all the orders were minor and it took only a days work to be compliant, now it's extensive effort on his part for compliance. I also love how he is supporting the legal team, dream on Mark :laugh: He can support the legal team because he went to college to study law, remember? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 Maybe it wouldn't have taken up quite so much of his time if he wasn't continuously writing essays about how wonderful he is? Not to mention umpteen fake profiles :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minimax Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 Pity it's full of more lies but at least he's no longer spokesperson. He's so delusional. No one created these groups or started tearing him apart publicly because he was spokesperson for Moorook. They did it because of al the lies, grandstanding, intimidation, bullying, harassment and threats that came from him. It is his conduct and the conduct of his sidekicks that has put him in this position. Also, which is it? Is he stepping down because of the personal or cost or because he's no longer needed (i.e. got told to resign by Lola and her lawyers)? I'd say it's because he is no longer needed, as he said "I may no longer be needed as spokesperson, but indeed I will be a lifelong supporter" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 He still had to get a dig in and imply that haters were also a factor. Right is might and things worked the way they should for once! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linda K Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 I think it was because, as I think Jo said many pages earlier, that he would look for a way to step away from all of this, so he can get onto his campaigning, and leaving them in the lurch to face the music on their own. It has gotten too tough, in site of his bravado, so on his bike he goes, no doubt off to now save upteen cows from SAPol, and add his charm to the BSL campaign - his work here is now done. Don;t let the door hit you on the way out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_PL_ Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 Right, so from those posts he won't be 'official' but he isn't going to stop going on about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 Thankfully now there are a lot more eyes on him and any lies he tells while campaigning on animal welfare issues will be exposed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minimax Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 lol not donated but given as a gift? do they think they aren't being monitored and watched by the gaming licence people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minimax Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Wow, Awesome. Is it somewhere he will see it? Bet he ignores it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Oh he will see it It's currently being shared far and wide as well. He'll of course tell his followers to ignore it all. It's just such a great summary of the highlights (lowlights really) of Mark's appalling behaviour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Fox Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Thanks Ridgie. They still weren't really clear about the fact that he is 100% wrong about the law changing in March but it's better than not printing a correction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minimax Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Thanks RidgieMal. It's much better than their first effort at reporting the situation. I hope it makes them realise they are being watched, so giving "gifts" instead of donations still isn't above board. Why don't they just get the flippin licence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 To be honest I can't see the office approving them now since they have significant breaches in the past and they continue to breach knowing they are under investigation. They don't just hand them out, they have to be approved and I think they've blown that now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kajirin Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Reading the article it came across as the laws aren't new and have been in place since 1939 with amendments in 1995 and that MA had no idea whatsoever [with the rehashing of what he said]. Well that's how I read it :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I think I'd like a few extra words added to it to make it perfectly clear and specific to Moorook. I think after dealing with vagueness for the last two months on Moorook I am getting very picky! Mark deleted comments about the open letter and banned those who talked about it. One was banned for bringing up the fact he said a little lower on his page that he supports free speech yet he banned her friend, it was very meta :laugh: His general response is to just lie some more about non existent SAPOL investigations and reiterate that we are all mentally ill and in love with him. Yes, that is how he deals with problems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kajirin Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 Oh dear, MA comes across as being the King of Confabulation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now