tdierikx Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 That's a pretty scary list of issues that they say were evident in the dogs/cats they seized. I don't know how they are going to counter them... T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minimax Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Do the general public not understand the difference between being responsible for an illness, and providing appropriate vet care? That screencapped post from Kat whoever insinuates that Lola is innocent because she isn't responsible for the dogs arthritis, but that's not the charge. The charge is not providing adequate medical care, and I'm slightly worried that some people don't think there is anything wrong with not providing adequate medical care for a sick or injured animal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackJaq Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 I would not want to be Lola's vet at this time, since all the animals were supposedly receiving treatment from what I gather? If she has receipts detailing that vet seeing the animals in question then surely that would be sufficient proof that she was providing vet care and the vet would be next in line for not picking up and treating those conditions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Jesus, shit got real The supporters seem to be made up of a lot of people who aren't too smart and have not verified a thing Moorook has claimed. Of course they are going to deny they left conditions unmedicated. You can't see inside a dog and unless Lola has been on top of things the oldies could be suffering unless they had complete check ups including blood screens. None of the list surprises me either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 I think that is too sophisticated for them to understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheridan Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Firstly, if the animals that she has been charged over have been treated by her vet then that's her defence. Secondly, regarding the latest 'other shelters' post, has anyone asked what other shelters they are? I've not heard of any shelter in Vic being closed down by the RSPCA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 People can ask but the supporters would lynch you if you asked the wrong way. It wouldn't matter if they got the facts wrong, they'd just say that isn't important, I saw them do this already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 If I'm still around I might go to the hearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Keep an eye out for a date in case I miss it. Probably have to line up early because the supporters will all want to be inside as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Don't underestimate my current level of dumb :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdierikx Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Snook - one of your screenshots shows an action planned for June 24 at 4 Kay Ave, Berri... I believe that is the court house... so that may be the date she has to appear?? T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Berri court doesn't list cases that far ahead so I can't check there. I wonder if they did have a date all ready for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 I thought I read separately that she was to attend Berri. I would have though Adelaide as well because Berri only does civil cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 It's in this one, looks like it is that date. This was just posted on Mark's page.. I thought it was interesting about the RSPCA allegedly planning on spending 24 hours at Moorook. Do they do that?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 They do do criminal at Berri. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Less is more. I might ask the court clark what the protocol is for getting inside to watch a case. I'd say a lot of people will be asked to stay out because they'll want the crowd to look as big as possible. I would really like to see the evidence for myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheridan Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 The RSPCA closed one of their own shelters in Victoria last year. Does that count? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 That's probably it :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WreckitWhippet Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 One would have thought that photo's upon arrival to show a dogs condition and a vet check would have been in order as soon as a dog comes into care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_PL_ Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 They need decent lawyers and that man needs to shut up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now