Are You Serious Jo Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 This is why PR says Venna has been in the pound for so long...drumroll Venna is one of the longest serving residents at Blacktown - because she is a brindle and not too keen on other dogs. Venna loves her hoomans though so please get in touch about Venna - PM us a number or email XXXXXXXXXX with a number to save Venna I am quite sure that is the reason and not the not too keen on other dogs section of the sentence. ETA: I am just print screening all of it, just in case :laugh: Where was that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poochmad Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) deleted. blonde moment. Oops. Didn't need to delete, but can't undo...Double :laugh: Edited January 18, 2013 by poochmad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzy82 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Print screening? You know that computers now come with a snipping tool which is handy for taking screenshots? It's in Accessories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheridan Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I'm confused how the DOL forum software knows who members of PR are so they're unable to post here. That's some mighty clever BB coding. Really? How do you know that? Mel Norman says so in response to a post on that DOL Forums Beware FB page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Apparently that is what is happening, a certain group of people cannot join and post because by some Tom Cruise witchcraft the board registration software knows who they are. For reals, I read it on FB :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Her Majesty Dogmad Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) I don't understand how they can hold a clause 16D but not be a rescue. I need to get some ducks lined up but in the meantime I'm copying everything that looks relevant. You and the rest of us! When you apply for a Clause 16D it requires a great deal of information, it is hours of work but you also have to provide annual reports to the DLG. I cannot see how PR can have a Clause 16D and maintain it. Edited January 18, 2013 by dogmad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I don't understand how they can hold a clause 16D but not be a rescue. I need to get some ducks lined up but in the meantime I'm copying everything that looks relevant. You and the rest of us! When you apply for a Clause 16D it requires a great deal of information, it is hours of work but you also have to provide annual reports to the DLG. I cannot see how PR can have a Clause 16D and maintain it. I think there has to be a way to sort this, if we can all work together and split the workload. I have a bit of time spare at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Anne~ Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 She is still there because she is only to be released to rescue and one hasn't taken her. Is it standard routine for dogs to be held for 34-80 days by the pound? I didn't think it would be. The dog has been there since Oct, is that a pound thing or is PR funding it? Can they pay for the kenneling in a pound, or is it private kennels that they refer to when they ask for donations for kenneling? The comments I was reading on the PR facebook said they were collecting donations for the dog - for what exactly if she is still in the pound with no rescue back up. Again I'll say; wouldn't a call to AHF answer the question about why the dog was still there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I'd call but I don't have a home phone or mobile phone reception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheridan Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 She is still there because she is only to be released to rescue and one hasn't taken her. Is it standard routine for dogs to be held for 34-80 days by the pound? I didn't think it would be. The dog has been there since Oct, is that a pound thing or is PR funding it? Can they pay for the kenneling in a pound, or is it private kennels that they refer to when they ask for donations for kenneling? The comments I was reading on the PR facebook said they were collecting donations for the dog - for what exactly if she is still in the pound with no rescue back up. Again I'll say; wouldn't a call to AHF answer the question about why the dog was still there? What's AHF? I thought the dog was in Blacktown? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I thought AHF was a name I didn't recognise, they say she is in Blacktown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gertrude139 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Blacktown Animal Holding Facility is the name of the pound Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Anne~ Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Thank you Gertrude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minimax Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Apparently that is what is happening, a certain group of people cannot join and post because by some Tom Cruise witchcraft the board registration software knows who they are. For reals, I read it on FB :laugh: I saw that and cracked up laughing. I resisted the urge to reply something about maybe if they took the tinfoil hats off they would be allowed to join Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melzawelza Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Whenever a question is asked, they say the same thing over and over... Foster caring requires a rescue group. We need a rescue for her to save her up there - we are taking that offer seriously however we don't have a rescue to support the foster situation - we need to keep trying xox This is ridiculous. They have been sending dogs out to foster carers since they started, under their own name NOT another rescue group. I wonder if they've had so many bad experiences of dogs in foster homes that they're stopping doing it? I hope so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I almost asked if they had finished painting their roof with lead yet but I'm trying to tone down the bitchy as they are clearly not operating on a full deck :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dame Aussie Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) They're really not :laugh: the instigator keeps telling everyone to calm down, be nice etc as she simultaneously bags them out :laugh: I'm actually embarrassed for them all more than anything else :laugh: Edited January 18, 2013 by Aussie3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Are You Serious Jo Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 The embarrassing part for them is they have a 100% record of getting things wrong, I'd have given up long ago :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poochmad Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 What I don't understand is why people donate money to the organisation when the dog is still in the pound, often months on end? I would not give them money as there is no update on where the money goes. Here, money goes directly to the rescue group who has the dog. Or am I just reading too much into it and to everyone else it's as clear as mud? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheridan Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 What I don't understand is why people donate money to the organisation when the dog is still in the pound, often months on end? I would not give them money as there is no update on where the money goes. Here, money goes directly to the rescue group who has the dog. Or am I just reading too much into it and to everyone else it's as clear as mud? I was confused by that. One person said directly she donated $100 to have the dog kennelled but it's still in the pound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now