faytiges Posted July 31, 2011 Share Posted July 31, 2011 Hi, Just a question, think the one point deduction from group/show is not enough. This means a dog can win the best dog without actually winning a best in show. Think the points should be allocated at least 25/50 points less. Of course, many will disagree with this, but i feel we are rewarding the minor not the major winners. Would like other comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dellcara Posted July 31, 2011 Share Posted July 31, 2011 Hi, Just a question, think the one point deduction from group/show is not enough. This means a dog can win the best dog without actually winning a best in show. Think the points should be allocated at least 25/50 points less. Of course, many will disagree with this, but i feel we are rewarding the minor not the major winners. Would like other comments. ??? what pointscore? not sure I understand what you're saying ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamSnag Posted July 31, 2011 Share Posted July 31, 2011 Same i left it alone lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayly Posted July 31, 2011 Share Posted July 31, 2011 Do you mean a runner up in group/runner up in show winner getting one point less than best in group/in show? This means a dog can win the best dog without actually winning a best in show. But they may well be more a consistant winner? They beat all the other dogs, except one. I don't see the issue with them getting points for the dogs they beat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now