mirawee Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 I thought they had to be tested but were still eligible for registration. Looking closer you might be right. HYPP they can't have any copies of the defective gene and be registered but HERDA you can. The fact that they will register progency means that the clone WILL be registered - just not eligible for competition. Otherwise how does the society control the registration of progeny? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marion 01 Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 Just another example of cloning, is this too extreme. Story in the Morning Bulletin in Rocky. Story Link: http://www.themorningbulletin.com.au/story/2011/06/11/lab-clones-cow-to-produce-human-milk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoofnHoof Posted June 11, 2011 Share Posted June 11, 2011 Don't know depends whether it was needed I suppose I don't really know whether there is a shortage of human milk to justify it but I suppose no one would bother with it if they didn't think there was a need - or a market - for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOE Posted June 11, 2011 Share Posted June 11, 2011 A step into the unknowen. Well I know I don't feel cloning is good for any animal species. Good for the hip pocket of a few though. Cloning Bulls is pretty big business. Worship the all mighty dollar Richard. Thats all it has going for it. Smart little Lena was a horse not a bull Richard Bull was the owner and has some stunning horseflesh Docs Freckles Oak always been my fav Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now