Jump to content

Agility Experiment


 Share

Recommended Posts

I've just set up a big loop & got the video ready.

Jump, AF, jump, seesaw, tunnel, jump, jump

Plan is to run it with each dog once

then run it another 6 times with each dog, rewarding heavily with food on AF & SS

then run it again & compare the times on the first runs to the times on the last run.

Tomorrow, I will run it in the opposite direction, but reward with tug instead of food & again compare the times.

Lol, what a boring life I must lead, but I love doing stuff like this. Sometimes it tells me nothing...sometimes it tells me lots! Often being able to measure something makes a difference in your perception of it.

Hopefully this will be a "lots" experience.

Edited by Vickie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One little thing - don't forget to turn the see saw around for your reversed runs. :laugh:

:bolt: I'll try to remember that!

Should be extra interesting since they BOTH clocked exactly 11.2 seconds on their first run, will make it easy to compare results & progress.

The video is pretty hard to see as I had to move it back to fit it all in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just ran each 3 times in a row with food rewards & have already learnt something huge!

I AM SO UNFIT!!!!

Both are slower Getting onto position on their contacts with food, maybe bc I have never trained contacts with food? Or because I am decellerating to deliver it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just ran each 3 times in a row with food rewards & have already learnt something huge!

I AM SO UNFIT!!!!

Both are slower Getting onto position on their contacts with food, maybe bc I have never trained contacts with food? Or because I am decellerating to deliver it

interesting. I find that when I drill or run my dogs for a while on contacts that happens - I don't know why, but for some reason it seems to confuse them. (not suggesting that you are drilling, but it is the best comparison I had.)

They shouldn't really react to your decelleration though, in theory the decel should tell them something is going to happen after the obstacle, not at the end of it. (assuming independent contacts.)

Will look forward to hearing if they speed back up once food is out of the equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to get it up on my computer to time it accurately, but timing it on the video, it looks like Trim was a whole second faster on her last run & Shine stayed about the same as she did on the first run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not time well looking at the VCR

final times were

Trim

1st - 10.5 seconds

last - 9.7 seconds

Shine

1st - 11.2 seconds

last - 11.2 seconds

am trying to load video but keeps crashing on YouTube

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not time well looking at the VCR

final times were

Trim

1st - 10.5 seconds

last - 9.7 seconds

Shine

1st - 11.2 seconds

last - 11.2 seconds

am trying to load video but keeps crashing on YouTube

What a great idea. Were the results what you expected from the different dogs?

Also - probably a stupid question, but were the dogs fully warmed up before the first run? I only ask this because I have a mate who is a pro cyclist who in his younger days lost a time trial by a couple of seconds and when he and his coach worked it back his warm up was not as good as it could have been. I always wonder whether my dogs are warm enough before they compete.

AND - what do you think is a 'real' difference in times. eg: .1 or .2 is probably a bit neither here nor there, but almost as second seems significant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, they were warmed up first.

Not sure what I was expecting :laugh:

I did expect Trim to get faster with repetition as that's just the sort of dog she is. Totally the opposite to a dog who slows down with drilling...she gets faster.

Shine seems a bit flat overall today so not sure what her numbers mean.

here's an interesting point.

I just looked at Trim's part from where she first touched the AF till the SS banged. Her 2nd run was 1.1 seconds faster over this part so the contacts are definitely where she made the time up.

One second is significant enough over only 8 obstacles, but enormously significant over only 3 obstacles!

Edited by Vickie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To identify the exact time differences between the first and last runs, you could ghost one video on top of the other and then watch the replay. You would then instantly be able to see where the differences are. It's sort of like what the motor sport shows do to emphasis the differences in lines that drivers take. If you don't have an editing program that can do this, feel free to PM me and I'll have a go at it on the program I have here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...