Dracdog Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 (edited) Here are the results of the ballot that Dogs Qld recently sent to members as published on their website Member Voting Papers Dispatched 7,082 Voting Papers Received from Members 1,177 (represents 16.6% of votes dispatched) "Yes Votes" for the Concept Support Question 1,073 (represents 91.2% of votes received) from the results it looks fairly obvious that they will be keeping the existing committee for the next 2 years until the changes to the constitution are made. It is disappointing to see the low number of votes received though. Edited March 24, 2011 by Dracdog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.C Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 if they wanted a lot of members to vote, (but of course they did not) maybe they should have sent the papers out with time to reply, i received mine on the friday & it had to be in by monday??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erny Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 if they wanted a lot of members to vote, (but of course they did not)maybe they should have sent the papers out with time to reply, i received mine on the friday & it had to be in by monday??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakway Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 How about, I never received one at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beth. Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 if they wanted a lot of members to vote, (but of course they did not)maybe they should have sent the papers out with time to reply, i received mine on the friday & it had to be in by monday??? I was the same, got mine the Friday - and I didn't get home till after the post closed on the friday, so I could have only posted it on monday I still did pop it in the post - doubt it would have been counted/got there in time.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erny Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 If that was a common problem, then I'd be calling 'foul' and requesting a re-run with (this time) sufficient notice and receipt of ballot papers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullbreedlover Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Check out the Feb Dog News Australia. Interesting article. The reply I got from DogsQld (in regards to the questions I asked re the ballot) were somewhat "clinical" to say the least. Well I suppose to expect anything more would of been a bonus. There have also been a few posts on ozshow if you are a member. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NRMA Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Check out the Feb Dog News Australia.Interesting article. The reply I got from DogsQld (in regards to the questions I asked re the ballot) were somewhat "clinical" to say the least. Well I suppose to expect anything more would of been a bonus. There have also been a few posts on ozshow if you are a member. What does the dog news thing say and what is being said on ozshow.Not very helpful to tell us something is being said but not a hint of what it is for those of us who dont see either What did you reply say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullbreedlover Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Check out the Feb Dog News Australia.Interesting article. The reply I got from DogsQld (in regards to the questions I asked re the ballot) were somewhat "clinical" to say the least. Well I suppose to expect anything more would of been a bonus. There have also been a few posts on ozshow if you are a member. What does the dog news thing say and what is being said on ozshow.Not very helpful to tell us something is being said but not a hint of what it is for those of us who dont see either What did you reply say Sorry but I am not putting the article on here(except for the part below) nor the response I received. DNA does say that the RNA were not consulted about the Ballot which took place and that the future direction of the CCCQ should be determined by the members, not the Committee or the RNA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now