Jump to content

Play Behaviour


 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes, they work as both. It's like the dog saying "Everything I do next is pretend", but the other dog has the option to respond before the dog does anything more. I guess I don't generally think of it as an invitation because mostly when I see it the invitation is secondary. Like someone cracking a joke as an icebreaker is not just a joke, but also an invitation to engage. The invitation is secondary because it's assumed. Either you laugh at the joke, thus signalling your willingness to engage, or you don't laugh, signalling your unwillingness to engage. Maybe a bit of a far-fetched analogy, but it's one that seems to fit to me. Like an icebreaker joke, I most often see play bows where the receiver is a wee bit tense or uncertain, but still showing interest in engaging, and when a situation almost got too serious for everyone's comfort, and when "kidding around" behaviour is being acted out with more seriousness than usual, and to gloss over a faux pas, and of course as an invitation to engage in a friendly interaction.

Here's Kivi using it as an appeasement gesture:

PlayBow.jpg

He's like "I was just kiddin' around, Pen." He would certainly play with her if it had been interpreted by her as a play invitation. He also uses head tosses as both appeasement signals and play invitations. In this photo he'd tried a head toss first to invite play and Penny responded with the "Don't." look. Then he play bowed and she lifted her lip at him. At that point he cut his losses and backed out with another head toss or two. :love: Smart puppy.

ETA Actually, I think he wasn't inviting play with the first head toss. Penny didn't like being crowded when going through a small space like the baby gate. Now that I think about it I seem to remember he came through the gate with her with bouncy puppy enthusiasm and when he saw she was looking like she might snark at him he did the head toss.

Edited by corvus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great pic and post Corvus!

I can't see your all your pics Lollipup, we've had a major dip in power so some pics aren't loading for me on 3G. But I was going to say a play bow usually has front legs widely splayed and the mouth open and relaxed. I also often see a greeting bow which is when front legs are close together and mouth is closed but the dog is relaxed. It's like a stretch but different :love: .

Mark Bekoff's book The Emotional Lives of Animals is a great book that may help you. There's also the study done on dogs recognizing different types of growls ie play as distinguished from keep away. Can't post a link as computer is too slow to find it atm!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's also the study done on dogs recognizing different types of growls ie play as distinguished from keep away. Can't post a link as computer is too slow to find it atm!

Is it this one by Miklosi's group? Animal Behaviour 79 (2010) 917–925.

‘The bone is mine’: affective and referential aspects of dog growls

Tama´ s Farago´ a, Pe´ ter Pongra´ cz a, *, Friederike Range b, 1, Zso´ fia Vira´ nyi c, 2, A´ da´ m Miklo´ si a

A number of species are considered to use functionally referential signals such as alarm calls or food-

related vocalizations. However, this particular function of communicative interaction has not previously

been found in canids. We provide the first experimental indication that domestic dogs, Canis familiaris,

rely on context-dependent signals during interspecific agonistic encounters. We recorded several

sequences of growls from dogs in three different contexts: during play, guarding a bone from another

dog, and reacting to a threatening stranger. We analysed the acoustic structure of the growls and

additionally performed playback tests in a seminatural food-guarding situation. We found that play

growls differed acoustically from the other two (agonistic) types of growls, mainly in their fundamental

frequencies and formant dispersions. Results of the playback experiment showed that food-guarding

growls deterred other dogs from taking away a seemingly unattended bone more effectively than growls

recorded in the threatening stranger situation. We ruled out an effect of the signaller’s body weight on

the subjects’ responses. These results provide the first evidence of context specificity of agonistic

vocalizations in the dog. We discuss the possible aspects of honesty and deception through acoustic

modulation of growls.

Beckoff's book is next on my list of books to buy. :love:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's also the study done on dogs recognizing different types of growls ie play as distinguished from keep away. Can't post a link as computer is too slow to find it atm!

Is it this one by Miklosi's group? Animal Behaviour 79 (2010) 917–925.

‘The bone is mine’: affective and referential aspects of dog growls

Tama´ s Farago´ a, Pe´ ter Pongra´ cz a, *, Friederike Range b, 1, Zso´ fia Vira´ nyi c, 2, A´ da´ m Miklo´ si a

A number of species are considered to use functionally referential signals such as alarm calls or food-

related vocalizations. However, this particular function of communicative interaction has not previously

been found in canids. We provide the first experimental indication that domestic dogs, Canis familiaris,

rely on context-dependent signals during interspecific agonistic encounters. We recorded several

sequences of growls from dogs in three different contexts: during play, guarding a bone from another

dog, and reacting to a threatening stranger. We analysed the acoustic structure of the growls and

additionally performed playback tests in a seminatural food-guarding situation. We found that play

growls differed acoustically from the other two (agonistic) types of growls, mainly in their fundamental

frequencies and formant dispersions. Results of the playback experiment showed that food-guarding

growls deterred other dogs from taking away a seemingly unattended bone more effectively than growls

recorded in the threatening stranger situation. We ruled out an effect of the signaller’s body weight on

the subjects’ responses. These results provide the first evidence of context specificity of agonistic

vocalizations in the dog. We discuss the possible aspects of honesty and deception through acoustic

modulation of growls.

Beckoff's book is next on my list of books to buy. :love:

That's it! Thank you!

You'll enjoy Beckoff's book! It has a whole chapter on play in animals btw!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the title and though oh! Corvus changed her DOL name :laugh::thumbsup:

No help from here sorry! I only understand dog academics up to a point. :laugh:

Now THAT is a compliment! :rofl::laugh:

Ha! I missed that one. I'll take THAT as a compliment, too. :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will just add that Temple Grandin believes that one aspect of play is for the dogs to practice being the submissive and being dominant.

Mostly dogs are not all submissive or all dominant; they are submissive in some situations or ages, or with certain others and vice versa re dominance.

Play is an opportunity to pracitce both these things.

Have you noticed how dogs often take turns in play? one will be the chaser and then it will be the chased. and you can see it with wrestling too. Temple thinks that is an example of how they practice.

I know my dog Digby when he is having his turn of being dominant in play with Delta will be more dominant than in any other part of his life. He does seem to relish the opportunity :banghead:

That is just some food for thought for you :party:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...