Jump to content

Macro Lenses


Lab lady
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm thinking of buying a macro lens for my canon 450 but after having a look online i am totally confused :rolleyes: . There seems to be a huge range. I'm still very much a beginner so i really don't understand all the number that they quote. The more i read the more confused i get. :rofl:

I need the help of the DOL brains trust here.

What should i be looking for?

I know i want something that will give me a shallow DOF so should i be looking at 2.8.

HELP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two (well, three) Canon macros to consider when you are getting your first one:

Canon 60 2.8 macro - this is an awesome all rounder. Small, light, super sharp, easy to use, fast, focus, easy to hand hold. Would never be without mine. Not only does fabulous macro, but is a lovely lens for other shooting incuding portraits. Downsides: you have to get really close to small subjects for 1:1 macro.

Canon 100 macro - there are two versions, one with IS which is more expensive and one without. I have the one without.

Both are super sharp, pretty fast to focus and produce really nice images. Both are heavy and take a bit of getting used to hand holding. This focal length is also nice for shooting a little action or portraits etc if you have extra room to back up a bit. These lenses are physically way bigger than the 60mm.

The IS version is, by all accounts, a slightly better lens than the non-IS. However, only you can decide if the extra significant cash is worth it. For me, no, it wouldn't be worth it. The IS will allow a shorter learning curve in hand holding the lens steady but imho not quite enough to pay that much more.

I love my 100 macro BUT I don't use it nearly as much as my 60mm macro - or my 135L. I find the 100mm is an odd focal length for my style of shooting.

there are also third party macros that are good - especially the 50mm macro by Sigma. OH, and there is a 50mm macro from Canon, I believe, but the 60mm is in a totally different league so I never consider that unless you are only shooting on a full fram (5D or 1Ds etc) camera. The 60 is just too awesome.

Edited by kja
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I prefer the slightly longer macros too. Gives space to be back a little from the subject and keep full frame. Especially with the spiders or biting ants. And they are a good prime lens for portrait or medium/close action. I have the Sigma 150 macro, and have just also bought the Tamron 90 2.8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...