Jump to content

Legal People Needed!


superminty
 Share

Recommended Posts

So, I am drafting a letter to the local paper about the scourge of off lead dogs on the streets in my area as I am sick to death of it...but anyway...

What is the legal position if your dog is on lead, is approached by a dog that is off lead in an on lead area, and your dog bites/harms the off lead dog in any way?

In addition, is there any legal basis to say that if the other dog (the off lead one) retaliates, their owner is liable for any ensuing vet bills for your dog?

Have had a look through the various animal acts, but I am thinking it is more likely to be a common law basis, if anything. I vaguely recall people mentioning that some councils say they won't hold you at fault if your dog is on lead and the other off lead illegally, but I want hard evidence :(

Edited by superminty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SM - My understanding is that generally speaking, favour will be given to the on-lead dog. I doubt very much that it is written in ink (eg "the dog that is on-lead will always win out in a court of law -vs- an off lead dog") because if push was to become shove, I think any extreme merits of the situation may be taken into account. But, as I mention, I think the general consensus is that the on-lead would be favoured over the off-lead.

I'm not a legal eagle and relate only what I have heard/been told in the past. I do believe it is a Council Level "rule".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SM - My understanding is that generally speaking, favour will be given to the on-lead dog. I doubt very much that it is written in ink (eg "the dog that is on-lead will always win out in a court of law -vs- an off lead dog") because if push was to become shove, I think any extreme merits of the situation may be taken into account. But, as I mention, I think the general consensus is that the on-lead would be favoured over the off-lead.

I'm not a legal eagle and relate only what I have heard/been told in the past. I do believe it is a Council Level "rule".

Agreed. An on lead dog is under effective control unless the lead is long and the owner isn't paying attention to what it does. An off lead dog is not under effective control if it makes an unwanted approach to any person or animal and the owner is unable to prevent this by calling it back. Doesn't matter if it is an on lead or off lead area. No dog has the right to make an uninvited approach.

Edited by dancinbcs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most lawyers here would advise:

* free legal advice is pretty much worth what you pay for it.

* the devil in scenarios like this is in the detail. The classic legal response to this question would be "it depends".

* much will depend on the law where the incident occurs and on the severity of the responses by the dogs. Breaking the lead and killing a dog that approached for a sniff (as has happened) might see the owner of the onlead dog liable. Who knows?

My advice would be to leave legal issues out of your letter to the paper. Give one example and there will always be another case that overturns it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the on lead dog is under "effective control", then surely it would follow that it should not be the one to make the first aggressive move, yes?

If the on lead dog bites the off lead dog, and a fight ensues where one or both dogs are in need of veterinary attention, then it would probably be up to eyewitness accounts of the incident that will swing the "fault" one way or the other.

I own larger breed dogs - I have been in situations where an off lead dog has approached with intent, and my dogs take their lead from ME, not the other dog's antics. that is what I take the meaning of "effective control" to be - not just the fact that my dog is on a lead... I've seen plenty of on lead dogs who were clearly NOT under "effective control" by the people at the other end of those leads... *grin*

T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a girl friend of mine was walking her dogs on lead to the park in the Port Melb area recently. A big dog rushed them and although didn't attack he did frighten dogs and owner. She spoke to the loose dogs owner and he said it was her fault for being afraid and she would've passed it on to her dogs.

She reported him cause she knew where he lived and he was fined purely on her say so. I was very surprised that was all it took.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will depend on the detail of your State legislation, rather than any council regs. In NSW it's the Companion Animals Act (1998)... Hang on...

Right - have run off and looked. It is the Domestic Animals Act 1994. See here for a pdf or word version: http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/

You should be looking at Part 3 - Control of dogs and cats. Section 29 is about offences and liabilities with regard to dog attacks.

Bear in mind though, that these are offences, which have to be proven beyond reasonable doubt to be prosecuted. Dog attacks and wandering dogs etc can also become the subject of civil lawsuits, which have a different burden of proof - balance of probability - so can be easier to prove and have a wider scope than criminal matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has happened to me - my dog on lead, other dog off lead and no owner present (dog wandering). Other dog attacked mine and mine sustained large injuries (several thousand $ worth). Other owner was liable, agreed to pay but I had problems getting the money off them. Ended up taking them to small claims court to get the money (which I did in the end). The one that was attacked was already aggressive towards other dogs, did not harm the off lead dog (off lead dog a bull breed and much larger and stronger than she is).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had this discussion with my council one time before because the same lady would walk her dog offlead everyday and it would always come running up to me and Kane and i was worried about Kane attacking this dog. I was told that if my dog attacked the off lead dog, i wouldnt be held accountable because the other dog must be restrained or under command while out walking in public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had this discussion with my council one time before because the same lady would walk her dog offlead everyday and it would always come running up to me and Kane and i was worried about Kane attacking this dog. I was told that if my dog attacked the off lead dog, i wouldnt be held accountable because the other dog must be restrained or under command while out walking in public.

Thats what I was thinking...you arent meant to be out walking dogs round the streets without leads so surely it would automatically be the off lead dog owners responsibility.

Its a bit like driving an unregistered car, if you are in an accident, itd be your fault no matter what because you shouldnt have even been on the road int he first place (I am not sure if it works like that in Oz but does in NZ)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all for your replies.

The Domestic Animals Act in Vic doesn't even require a dog to be on lead, unless it is a greyhound or a restricted/dangerous dog - the on lead requirements are council regs.

Think I will leave that issue out - good advice poodlefan.

I will be contacting my local council to see whether I can get something in writing (huh, not likely) but wanted to see what the DOL brains trust had to say first :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The parts of this are covered under civil law and criminal law.

Criminal Law (Breach of Law/Regulations)

Where a law is broken (that's the dog being off leash) then the council/controlling body would/should fine the owner of the animal off leash (the police could even be able to lay criminal charges in the event of a serious incident).

Civil Law (damages)

Recovery of costs where your dog is attacked and injured is covered by civil law and it's up to you to take legal action for recovery of costs. Your recovery claim is easier to argue given that the defendant was in breach of the law.

Legal Aid can advise on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering about this too.

I was walking my boy on leash the other night and a dog rushed out of its property over the other side of the road. My boy is friendly but what would've happened if he didn't take kindly to being rushed from behind and jumped on? When the owners were asked to call their dog back they just asked "why" errr because you weren't paying one iota of attention and didn't have control over your dog until I yelled at you... They had to call three times before he went back over the road. Same people proceeded to walk their dog to the park minus a lead with the dog being nearly a full block in front.. effective control? I think not! If their dog rushes mine again I'll be reporting them, because what if it was someone else, or a child? My dog would never do anything (he purely wanted to play!) but I would like to walk around the neighbourhood without worrying about rushing dogs no matter whether they are friendly or not. I know if I'd been walking my bitch, it would've been a different scenario. She's fine with dogs face to face and slow introductions but not a dog rushing from behind like this one did. I walk her on leash and if I see a dog we swap sides of the road. She doesn't need muzzling for that.

Edited by Bundy's Mum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...