Fit for a King Posted March 14, 2010 Share Posted March 14, 2010 I watched a few people judging yesterday - one (who was very tall) would bend slightly at the waist to watch the dogs come back to him.....I thought it sensible to get closer to a front on shot rather than looking down at an angle but overheard a couple of judges tut tutting saying how they had "told him before to stop doing that" - I couldn't see the harm (apart from perhaps having a slightly sore back at the end of the day)...any thoughts anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poodlefan Posted March 14, 2010 Share Posted March 14, 2010 (edited) I watched a few people judging yesterday - one (who was very tall) would bend slightly at the waist to watch the dogs come back to him.....I thought it sensible to get closer to a front on shot rather than looking down at an angle but overheard a couple of judges tut tutting saying how they had "told him before to stop doing that" - I couldn't see the harm (apart from perhaps having a slightly sore back at the end of the day)...any thoughts anyone? It might be intimidating/threatening to the dog? I suppose handlers can always stop a little further back. Or maybe judges know it will give you a dodgy back. Edited March 14, 2010 by poodlefan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellz Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 Perhaps he already has a back/hip/knee complaint and they had told him not to stand like that so as not to aggravate it? I personally don't like some VERY tall judges because they tend to kind of loom over smaller dogs, especially in Specials lineups where the dog doesn't get the chance to see the judge from the table first. And it can be even worse if they are wearing a hat which can throw some pretty amazing looking shadows on the ground for dogs to freak at! In these cases, I do wish judges would be a little more considerate. But each to their own style and you just mark in your little black book what the individual judge does or if there is anything you need to be concerned about for next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fit for a King Posted March 15, 2010 Author Share Posted March 15, 2010 Thanks guys - I got the impression from the comments that they didn't think it appropriate to look at the dog from anything except full height - I actually prefer to watch dogs come toward me when I'm sitting or kneeling - you can see straight on what's happening with them - I/m guessing this is what that judge was doing but the others didn;t seem to think this necessary..... surely it should be up to the individual to determine their style? I agree re hats, also dark glasses and flapping coats..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellz Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 Thanks guys - I got the impression from the comments that they didn't think it appropriate to look at the dog from anything except full height - I actually prefer to watch dogs come toward me when I'm sitting or kneeling - you can see straight on what's happening with them - I/m guessing this is what that judge was doing but the others didn;t seem to think this necessary.....surely it should be up to the individual to determine their style? I agree re hats, also dark glasses and flapping coats..... Judging is like exhibiting....you do what does best for you IMO. And in addition to hats, dark glasses and flapping coats......dangly earrings and bracelets, strong perfumes and nicotine fingers!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fit for a King Posted March 15, 2010 Author Share Posted March 15, 2010 and alcohol breath...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellz Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 and alcohol breath...... Oooh yeah!! Especially after lunch at a country Aggie show! Oh and I'd rather not find out secondhand that a judge had garlic for dinner the night before either....and neither would my dog! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogsfevr Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 Doesnt worry me what they do & having shown dogs low to the ground it is often commom practise to get down & truly see that movement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilbo Baggins Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 Its interseting to be sitting ringside and see a dogs movement. :D ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelpiesrule Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 Thanks guys - I got the impression from the comments that they didn't think it appropriate to look at the dog from anything except full height - I actually prefer to watch dogs come toward me when I'm sitting or kneeling - you can see straight on what's happening with them - I/m guessing this is what that judge was doing but the others didn;t seem to think this necessary.....surely it should be up to the individual to determine their style? I agree re hats, also dark glasses and flapping coats..... If I was a judge I certainly would be bending down to see the movement better, especially on the smaller dogs... and as a competitor, I find it reassuring for a judge to do this, as to me, it shows they are really interested in looking at the dogs. Much better than judges that barely look at your dogs as you are running around the ring! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LizT Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 Its interseting to be sitting ringside and see a dogs movement. :D ;) ;) Yeah, and it gives you the chance to go get the pooper scooper!!! Oh, you didn't mean THAT kind of movement!! LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilbo Baggins Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Its interseting to be sitting ringside and see a dogs movement. ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) Yeah, and it gives you the chance to go get the pooper scooper!!! Oh, you didn't mean THAT kind of movement!! LOL :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rysup Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 I will crouch down to watch smaller breeds on the move. You sometimes cannot see boo from a normal standing position. I consider myself on the taller side of things for a woman, though not as tall as some Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centitout Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Thanks guys - I got the impression from the comments that they didn't think it appropriate to look at the dog from anything except full height - I actually prefer to watch dogs come toward me when I'm sitting or kneeling - you can see straight on what's happening with them - I/m guessing this is what that judge was doing but the others didn;t seem to think this necessary.....surely it should be up to the individual to determine their style? I agree re hats, also dark glasses and flapping coats..... I have to wear dark glasses as i have extremely sun sensitive eyes due to years of hay fever and it causes physical pain with even the slightest glare.I didnt realise other exhibitors found it annoying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellz Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 I have to wear dark glasses as i have extremely sun sensitive eyes due to years of hay fever and it causes physical pain with even the slightest glare.I didnt realise other exhibitors found it annoying It's more when judges wear INSANELY dark glasses and then LOOM over dogs and frighten the bejesus out of them. I couldn't give a toss if other exhibitors wear dark glasses, they don't immediately impact upon my dogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centitout Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Ok,i feel better now,thought i'd crossed some unwritten rule or something :D or would have to squint my way around the ring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becks Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 I see no problem if a judge wants to get into a better postion to view the dogs movement, it's something I do sometimes. The only time it has been a problem was when my dog jumped into the lap of the judge for a quick cuddle! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullbreedlover Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 I am a tall person(just under 6 foot tall) and even though during judges training it was mentioned to me that I shouldnt bend over as such to see the dogs for or aft movement, I find it is better for me if I do. Especially with the smaller dogs. I dont have a problem with it. I would rather have a judge interested in movement than one who wasnt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SparkyTansy Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Stonebridge was there a reason why at judges training they said you shouldn't bend over to watch movement judging? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becks Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 If you are leering over the top of the area of an approaching dog, some my not want to approach to close, but you can always stand up as the dog gets closer, so this isn't an issue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now