Baby Dragon Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 TIGER Airways has admitted it blundered, again, after it told a disabled woman she couldn't fly on the airline because it does not carry medical-alert dogs.The disabled woman complained to the Human Rights Commission after she was told the only assistance dogs the airline allowed were seeing-eye dogs - a stance that is at odds with the airline's own policy published on its website. Disability Discrimination Commissioner Graeme Innes warned that airlines faced government regulation if they did not establish plans covering disabled travellers' needs. It is the latest incident in what is fast forming a pattern, after a series of recent complaints that have involved Tiger, Jetstar and Qantas baulking at carrying assistance dogs. In this latest case, the woman booked a return flight between Melbourne and Queensland using the internet, and rang Tiger to explain that she would be flying with her medical-alert dog. Her dog is registered as an assistance dog and is cleared to fly by aviation authorities. But Tiger staff told her that only seeing-eye dogs were allowed, and she was denied the right to speak to a manager. Tiger Airways Australia's commercial director Steve Burns admitted staff got the airline's policy advice wrong, describing the mistake as a misunderstanding and a ''communication error that caused confusion''. The airline had apologised to the woman and said it would honour the booking. Mr Innes said some airlines were slow to fix problems. ''We have seen incidents of inappropriate and undignified treatment of people with disability by airlines feature in the media during the past month, and they are only the tip of the iceberg,'' he said. Mr Burns said Tiger would take ''immediate action to remind our staff and business partners of our policies'' and is introducing better training for its staff. http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-new...91222-lbqr.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WreckitWhippet Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 I wonder if it was one of those self-badged, home trained "assistance dogs" that are popping up on a regular basis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frufru Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 and I quote: "Her dog is registered as an assistance dog and is cleared to fly by aviation authoirities" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
persephone Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 Her dog is registered as an assistance dog and is cleared to fly by aviation authorities. And the staff of the airlines should be educated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poochmad Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Her dog is registered as an assistance dog and is cleared to fly by aviation authorities. And the staff of the airlines should be educated Agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now