Uk Kennel Club Response To The Bateson Report

[Jed]

http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/item/2883/23/5/3

Kennel Club Response to the Independent Inquiry into Dog Breeding

14-Jan-10

The Kennel Club has broadly welcomed Professor Sir Patrick Bateson’s ‘Independent Inquiry into Dog Breeding’, which has recommended that steps be taken to tackle irresponsible breeders and to change the way the public think about buying dogs.

The Kennel Club, which commissioned and funded the report in conjunction with Dogs Trust, welcomes the report’s focus on irresponsible breeders who farm puppies with little concern for their welfare and those who sell poorly socialised puppies on to owners to use as ‘status dogs’ or as fighting weapons.

The Kennel Club agrees that additional training and support needs to be given to local authorities, which are responsible for issuing breeding licences to those people who breed five or more litters of puppies in a single year, as the current provisions are deemed to be ineffective. It agrees that compulsory microchipping of dogs and increased public education to stop people falling prey to puppy farmers and to help them find responsible breeders are necessary.

It is also glad that the report recognises the need for a ‘robustly policed and well respected quality assurance scheme’, consisting of breeders that buyers can trust to look after their puppies’ health and welfare, and that it suggests that the Kennel Club’s Accredited Breeder Scheme, with some modification could be used.

However, the Kennel Club is concerned that the report could have gone further and that its recommendations do not appear directly to cover those breeders who breed less than five litters per year and who are not part of the Kennel Club Accredited Breeder Scheme. The Kennel Club would have liked to have seen a recommendation for regulation to ensure that these breeders follow higher standards, such as compulsory health testing.

Caroline Kisko, Kennel Club spokesperson, said: “Whilst the report recognises that the majority of breeders are responsible, there are those whose actions are bringing the rest of the dog breeding community into disrepute and this needs to be stopped.

“We are glad that the report recognises that the Kennel Club has made a good start in its efforts to unite responsible breeders within its Accredited Breeder Scheme, for the benefit of puppies and puppy buyers, and we believe that this should be the basis for moving forward. We are currently working towards UKAS accreditation of the scheme as suggested by Professor Bateson.

“We agree that responsible breeders should be rewarded and believe that the show ring is the best forum for this. The report recognises that ‘dog showing and judging are a powerful lever for change’ and the Kennel Club is dedicated to ensuring that only the healthiest dogs are rewarded at shows.

“Public education is vital and all dog welfare organisations must continue to work together to ensure that people know what to look for when buying a dog.”

The report looks at genetic diversity in breeds and recognises that the Kennel Club has banned close matings. It advises that future decisions about matings that could affect genetic diversity should be ‘breed specific’ and made upon evidence based scientific information and advice. To this end it is recommended that the veterinary profession should gather data to show the prevalence of certain diseases and that an advisory council should develop evidence based breeding strategies.

Mrs Kisko continued: “The Kennel Club has long recognised that genetic diversity plays a crucial role in safeguarding the health of dogs and the report is absolutely right to suggest that there are no further blanket rules in place but that decisions are based upon scientific knowledge and are made on a breed by breed basis. This is why we are well on the way to creating a new database which will revolutionise the way that we record dog health data. The data will enable us to bring out our Mate Select programme, which will help breeders to find suitable mating pairs which are most likely to produce healthy offspring. The database will go further than the report’s recommendation, as the data will be attributable to specific dogs, rather than being anonymous, and will give us a better picture of the health of pedigrees and crossbreeds. Such knowledge is critical and will enable us to provide information to breeders, vets, geneticists and ultimately the puppy buyer.

“We are keen to harness as much knowledge as possible for the benefit of dogs so we welcome the principle of an advisory council whose members will work with the Kennel Club to advise on decisions about breeding and health. A structure already exists in the form of the Kennel Club’s Dog Health Group with its recently extended remit. Additional independent experts include canine and human geneticists, veterinary surgeons and an epidemiologist. Using this framework for establishing the advisory council under an independent chairman would save significant sums of money, which can instead be devoted entirely to the dog health research that the report identified as being in ‘urgent’ need of more funding.”

The Kennel Club and Dogs Trust will now arrange a meeting between all relevant parties in order to move forward with the recommendations from all three reports.

The full report may be downloaded at www.dogbreedinginquiry.com

To view the Kennel Club and Dogs Trust joint statement click here.

[HOGWARTZBOXERS]

Interesting.....

Thanks for posting this.

Hogz

[mita]

A nice summary....but it consists of points that people interested in the topic have already made. Go look at past threads on DOL, for example.

However, it's good to see the key issues & needs gathered into one document which, hopefully, will be used as a reference to make things just previously wished for....happen.

A key point, tho', was the reference to 'breeders' who are outside any Kennel Association regulative network. Yet, it's from such sources that the majority of problems may be coming from. UQ research here....certainly pointed to the shortcomings of unregistered breeders re socialisation & the production of accidental litters.