Lex Ang Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 Microchip Cancer Report From Katherine Albrecht [email protected] 11-20-7 CASPIAN Sets record straight after misleading claims by HomeAgain and VeriChip implant manufacturers. A new paper titled "Microchip-Induced Tumors in Laboratory Rodents and Dogs: A Review of the Literature 19902006" has been released today by CASPIAN. The full, 48-page paper provides a definitive review of the academic literature showing a causal link between implanted radio-frequency (RFID) microchip transponders and cancer in laboratory rodents and dogs. In addition, a brief, four-page synopsis of the full report is being made available. Eleven articles previously published in toxicology and pathology journals are evaluated in the report. In six of the articles, between 0.8% and 10.2% of laboratory mice and rats developed malignant tumors around or adjacent to the microchips, and several researchers suggested the actual tumor rate may have been higher. Two additional articles reported microchip-related cancer in dogs. In almost all cases, the malignant tumors, typically sarcomas, arose at the site of the implants and grew to surround and fully encase the devices. In several cases the tumors also metastasized or spread to other parts of the animals. Public revelation of a casual link between microchipping and cancer in animals has prompted widespread public concern over the safety of implantable microchips. The story was first broken to the public in September through an article written by Associated Press Reporter Todd Lewan. Prior to the AP story, the journal articles were completely unknown outside of small academic circles. "The AP did a superb job informing the public of the existence of these journal articles," said Dr. Katherine Albrecht, a leading privacy expert and long-time VeriChip opponent who authored the new paper. "Unfortunately," Dr. Albrecht added, "a lot of misinformation about the cancer research has circulated since Mr. Lewan's article was published. I wrote the report to set the record straight." The animal-microchip study findings were so compelling that one of Mr. Lewan's sources, Dr. Robert Benezra, head of the Cancer Biology Genetics Program at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, was quoted as saying, "There's no way in the world, having read this information, that I would have one of those chips implanted in my skin, or in one of my family members." Nevertheless, representatives of the chipping industry have made inaccurate public statements about the research findings in an effort to confuse the public. Scott Silverman, CEO of the VeriChip Corporation which makes the controversial VeriChip human implant, recently provided inaccurate information to Time Magazine. Mr. Silverman is quoted as saying that none of the tumors found in mice in a 2006 French study were malignant. In fact, not only were the tumors malignant sarcomas, but most of the afflicted animals died prematurely as a result of the microchip-associated tumors. In addition, Destron Fearing, makers of the HomeAgain pet implant, dismissed a finding of fibrosarcoma--a highly lethal cancer--as 'benign' in a recent report. A fibrosarcoma is a type of sarcoma, a malignant tumor of soft tissue that connects, supports or surrounds other structures and organs of the body. Dr. Timothy Jennings, an expert on implant-induced cancers in humans, said he was "not aware of any nosology incorporating an entity of 'benign fibrosarcoma'" and agreed that "any tumor classified as sarcoma should be viewed as malignant." "Either VeriChip and the makers of HomeAgain actually don't understand the difference between a benign fibroma and a malignant fibrosarcoma," noted Dr. Albrecht, "or they're deliberately lying to the public. Either way, it's clear they can't be trusted. We hope our new report will set the record straight." The report includes a one- to three-page writeup on each of the original studies. In addition to a detailed review of the academic literature, the report contains recommendations for patients, pet owners, veterinarians, and policy makers, including the following: (1) Further microchipping of humans should be immediately discontinued; (2) Implanted patients should be informed in writing of the research findings and offered a procedure for microchip removal; and (3) Policy makers should reverse all animal microchipping mandates. As part of its public awareness campaign, CASPIAN will be issuing copies of the new report to leading policy and decision makers. The full 48-page report and four-page synopsis are also immediately available for public download at www.antichips.com/cancer/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
felix Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 I am so not surprised with this. And microchipping is compulsory in some states. The problem is microchipping is politically correct thing to do these days, so as desexing. It is hard to go against the trend. Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Avanti* Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 Oh dear Lex Ang. I guess we have to weigh up the pros and cons. Microchips help lots to keep a dog with their committed owner/s. The voiceless need that. They can be so vulnerable and so much need their human carer. Many die in pounds when that bond is lost. I guess preservatives and chemicals in some food is more of a concern. Then we have to consider flea treatment, vacinations etc. Not a good argument but it all has to considered. We can only do our best to limit these hazards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now