sandgrubber

I'd not be very worried. It's a shock for a baby puppy to be taken from its litter mates and sometimes it takes a few weeks to get their self confidence in line. If shyness persists for months, sure, it needs looking into. But at first, relax, take it slowly, don't push. Let her curiosity and playfulness draw her into things. If she pulls back, let her.

Not clear if this is restricted to the US Too Much Vitamin D In Dog Food May Have Poisoned Pets, Spurring Recalls And FDA Alert https://n.pr/2QfLasj

There are people who prefer not to deal with a baby puppy and will want a nearly grown dog. I wouldn't expect much of a discount unless there is a problem with the pup. Was he run on, and didn't come up to show quality? Didn't sell sounds unlikely as cav puppies are generally on wait list.

All over the place. Depends on breed, age, why rehoming, breeder's emotions (I've given away dogs when the new home is fantastic) and financials. Not easy to generalize.

Confused. The AmStaff isn't the same breed as a bull terrier. If you just want the type, why not go for a staffie? Much greater selection, less worry about breed regulation. Same wiggly bum.

All the things said above, plus, if the dog doesn't have papers, it will be vulnerable to being classified as a pit bull, with all the associated legal problems. Another breed problem may be dog aggression. AmStaffs are not bred for fighting, nor are most pitties, but both breeds have tendencies to be dog aggressive, and it can require a lot of work to keep this in check.

Some breeders, especially the well known ones, get so much email they throw up their hands. It's not like they are commercial enterprises, and often they have more calls for pups than they can handle. Try phoning... or the relevant breed club.

Oops.... This is an old thread... No need to repeat myself

Yes, pain relief can be a little pricey, and yes, Big pharma charges $1++ per tab for pills that cost pennies to produce (don't blame the vet for that). If you're not willing to pay for it, giving her her wings is kinder than continued and worsening pain. There's no easy cure for HD in an old dog.

My mob bunch up my carpet runners almost daily.

Not in qld and don't know any vets there. My impression is that you are likely to end up with scripts for Cartofen and maybe gabepentin, possibly steroids (injection?) . If your girl is heavy, weight loss, swimming recommended. (I have arthritis in my hip and had several arthritic / dyspaisic dogs to look after in my days running a boarding kennel). The peer reviewed literature isn't real positive about any of the supplements that get recommended, or about acupuncture.

One of my Labs is rat obsessed. She'll wait patiently for hours to catch and kill the occasional rat that gets into the pantry. (I leave doors open and rars do come in). I suspect rat drive is present in many (most?) breeds, but stronger in some individuals.

The vet didn't see anything major... apart from old age and excess weight. Partial collapse of larynx could be responsible for panting. Weight loss should help if that's the problem. Prescription: 20% less food, 50% more meticam. It turned cool again today (14 C and raining). Jarrah pants less when it's cold.

http://floridapolitics.com/archives/280365-dog-racing-ban-amendment-13?fbclid=IwAR160aymwnlqWzZ4TSsR2nLU85U_VguJ-6y0KkSkithxd61oYDjeScnXh4I One bit of USA election news that didn't get much press.

Jarrah is 14 and declining in many ways. I'm fighting with the big hard decision. Latest problem is that she pants heavily at night. Two related problems. One, I suspect it's a sign of pain. Two, it keeps me awake and makes me anxious. I've moved and don't have a trusted vet within 2000km. I have a vet appointment tomorrow with a vet I don't know (though I know the practice deals with a lot of rural people and isn't inclined to be sentimental) to make the awful decision. The rational brain says there's no point to doing a lot of tests and palleatives. My emotions want to keep her going. Seeking advice generally about how to interpret excessive panting, and how to make the awful decision.

https://www.prime7.com.au/news/4614-dogs-starved-to-death

I'd hesitate to make much of this in the case of Lab colors because 1. All closed registries are arbitrarily reduced gene pools. 2. Genetic exchange between chocolate Labs and yellow and black Labs is not highly, restricted... and for many breeds the total breed population is MUCH smaller than the population of chocolate Labs.

Yellow, please. A golden Labrador is a Labrador x Goldie. I agree, cream color has become more prevalent, but the true fox red has always been rare

I wouldn't look. Fox reds are rare, and anyone breeding for them is working from a very restricted gene pool. See recent posts on health in chocolate Labs. It's not that the color itself is bad, but breeders who specialize in a rare color are likely to overlook health and temperament factors to get the desired color. Also to inbreed. Fox red is MUCH less common than chocolate, and the problems that come with breeding for color are likely to be acute.

This may seem harsh, but all dog insurance is a bet that your dog needs considerably more vet care than average. In that case, you shouldn't be breeding. And if you can't finance an emergency cesarean or withstand possible loss of a litter or bitch, you still should not be breeding.

Can you provide any evidence of this? My first chocos was a surprise from a black x yellow mating. When I bred her, I preferred (not strongly, but there's such a wide selection of Labs at stud, even a weak preference can be followed without sacrifice) black carrying both yellow and chocos... rainbow litters are the best if you aren't concerned about color and expect puppy buyers to have color in mind. Show oriented people don't want dudleys, but most lab pups go to pet homes, and the only thing wrong with a dudleys is some idiotic words in the breed standard that disqualifies them in the ring.

How dogs could help eradicate malaria https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2018/10/29/how-dogs-could-help-eradicate-malaria/

I have 3 chocolate Labs, aged 14 (probably won't make 15), 9 (acts middle aged) and 5 (acts like a puppy). Grand dam, dam and pup. I don't dispute the findings, but it ain't necessarily so. The problem is poor breeding, not colour per se.

So why do so many breeders refuse to sell to people who may want to have a litter? That 1% could be a lot higher if breeders weren't so precious about who is fit to have a litter. And, BTW, modern evidence suggests that overly hygienic conditions result in weak immune systems... a litter in the house may contribute to kids being asthma free and less vulnerable to colds.

I'm not at all bothered that people have a preference for a relatively common color in a common breed. If there's too much to choose from, it's fine to use an arbitrary criteria to narrow the field. As for reading through the list of breeders, you can get a sense of what they emphasize in their descriptions. I worry if it's all about ribbons without much on health... and I look for specific mention of what they do to breed for health. It's good to find a breeder who can tell you about the health status of great grand sires and dams...if they are still alive, and if not, what they died of at what age, etc