sandgrubber

Great job on the photos. It's hard to capture anything that small. I can't answer the question, except to say, looks like two body segments and six or eight legs and they are tiny, hence good chance that they're not adults. I think that rules out insects which have three body segments and are worm-like in larval stage and makes it likely that they are Arachnids. If Bo is suffering, my guess is you might be able to smother these guys with some sort of oil. As a Labbie, he'll probably lick it off . . . but if you use a healthy veggie oil it won't do any harm other than adding some Joules to his diet. I'd be wary of using pesticides, many of which are nerve poisons and aren't good to apply to places that dogs lick..[Corrected taxonomy . . . I remembered wrong].

To be honest I find this shocking. You would really save your dogs over the life of a child? I love my dogs, they mean everything to me, but I couldn't place their lives as more important than that of a child. ... My dogs are a huge part of my life, but they don't rule my life. This is not a burning house situation. The issue is meeting in a public place . . . dog on line and supposedly under control. The kid is seldom on a leash. Mums range from 'in control' to 'out of it'. This doesn't have to be an either-or. Just be prepared to reign your dogs in if potential conflict arises. Surely, you can pull the leash in, grab the collar and leave the dog with no option to attack. If the kid insists on closing in and you have your had on the collar . . . or the dog in a muzzle . . . you have a valid case that you did your part to avoid a nasty problem. Also understand, if you value your dog over someone else's kid, in the extreme case you could be guilty of some form of manslaughter or assualt . . . not nice charges to face. The law is stacked in favour of kids.

Really? See, if you're making that as a sweeping statement to all homeopathy, that's where I disagree. I can certainly attest to Calendula Tea having tremendous results for the applications I have put it to. And because of the Calendula, I've been able to steer away from anti-histamines, cortisone. So saying "Homeopathy can never work" is a huge statement that in my experience is simply wrong. Calendula Tea isn't homoeopathy. Tea is made by brewing the flowers in hot water. Where as Homoeopathic remedies are over 99% water and a possibly indiscernible amount of calendular. Calendula is a well known mild herbal treatment because of the chemicals it contains. Homeopathic remedy doesn't contain any of these useful chemicals. I plead guilty to bringing Calendula into the argument. My maternal grandmother loved the stuff. She was born 120 yrs ago, and swore by Calendula cerate ointment (which everyone in my family uses and swears by, including my now-deceased father, who was a top-of-the-class Harvard educated physician). She bought if from homeopathic practitioners . . . and I think of it as homeopathic. My Dad was fond of saying . . . with respect to alternative medicine . . . that there are pearls among the trash. There's also a lot of trash in market-driven modern treatments. I think we all need to keep an open, and critical, mind with respect to medicine.

That's a good point, however I think the exceptions should be noted - where effective treatment is foregone in favour of homeopathy or prayer. Or where risk is increased on an unproven principle (e.g homeopathic "vaccines"). I've lost count of the number of times I've seen Rescue Remedy suggested where a dog might benefit greatly from an anxiolytic or given effective behaviour modification. Good point.

Most likely someone is being paid less than $10/hr for doing the work and gets no benefits. Big surprise. They do a quick and dirty job. If you want quality grooming, go to a groomer that is known by name, not some company that hires people off the street and gives them a few hours of training, and expect to pay for a pro job.

Confession. 15 years in Oz made me love Australian slang. I think 'dog's breakfast' should be interpreted to mean what in the USA we'd call 'mish-mash'. It has nothing to do with dogs (although mish-mash breakfasts may be traditional dog breakfasts for som colourful elements of Australia's population). Picky, picky, picky. Worth ignoring. So someone uses widely used slang. Why take it as a comment relating to dogs? As intended, I'd say the situation is a dog's breakfast . . . and it has nothing to do with dogs.

What?? Americans think they can switch on Summer from a slot machine???? I'm easily confused. Does this quote come in discussion of this post? What does it have to do with Americans (asked honestly as a dual Aus/USA citizen)? Or was it supposed to be funny? I don't get the joke.

Thanks for posting this . . . totally funny . . . totally harmless. I posted it on to friends and family . . . great fun.

Hell yeah what is there to consider? Their dog killed their baby. I wouldn't want that dog anywhere near me, if it was mine. RIP little baby If they are pro dog racers, it seems likely they will blame themselves . . . which I'd say is the correct assignment of blame . . . rather than the dog. The dog should not have been near the baby. Sled dogs are tough critters and not always gentle.

Not at all. Owners need to be prepared to things that don't go to script. If your dog is likely to use its teeth, be prepared to reign it in, and understand that you may end out in deep yoghurt if it bites a kid . . . even if the kid is a bit wacko and the Mum isn't being responsible at the moment. Kids outrank dogs when it comes to law. It's fine to swear at irresponsible Mums and out-of-control kids (both pretty common, sigh). Swear away. But you don't want to end out in court after your dog has chewed up someone's little darling. In law, dogs are property. Humans have rights that are protected by law.

Agreed. But it a few million spent on ads doesn't improve the product one iota. Repeat. Enjoy the ad, but don't let it influence you. Business is business. But rational decision making ignores ads and looks only at value and price. Adds play on your emotions, which are not going to lead to better purchasing decisions. Be rational.

I don't think this service (subset of general forum) is functioning well. Toxicity and the question of 'what kills you in the long term' are very different quesions. My parent both lived to 75 yrs plus, and both died of cancer. If they had died at 60 yrs, the cause of death would have been different. It would be better if this section of the forum was used to report acute toxicity. Eg, my dog had fits after applying such-and-such a drug or pesticide. That is REALLY interesting...and very scary!!

Great viewing. BUT It would be interesting to know how much Purina spent to make that ad and get it viewed on prime time. I don't consider myself a conspiracy theorist. But I think there's a huge body of evidence that the big guys who produce dog food, meds, etc., can produce some very appealing ads and use them to increase their profits. Bottom line. Appreciate the add. But don't let it influence your dog food purchases.

This survey needs an 'other' category. It doesn't get very hot here and my dogs almost always come with me when I go off premises. They're happy to spend a few hours in the car. When they hear the engine fire they come running so they can come along.

Amazing video. Thanks for posting. I've watched street dogs in Brazil (where they are callled 'can lickers') and think that the cruel natural selection that happens on the street produces some amazing dogs. Elsie seems like a great dog . . . very maternal . . . intelligent . . . adaptable . . .

Wonderful videos. Thanks for posting. Those GSD's don't look at all like a modern show GSD! The difference is spectacular. I hope some GSD people will comment.

Yup. These work great for some dogs. The crunch whack scrumple sound they make when they play with them seem to be a reward. For some dogs, especially in summer, it's good to hang these from a rope and fill them with water. The result is that they thump hard but not hard enough to damage when the dog pushes them around (many dogs love the thump) and they spout water when the dog succeeds in getting them in its grips. The water spout is another reward for some dogs.

Homeopathy works for me. Although I don't use wormers nor flea treatments. Been no need to. Haven't had a flea issue and instead of filling my dog with chemicals to get rid of worms that aren't there, I have had periodic faeces tests done. I haven't done a comparison but I'd suggest it's worked out the same price if not cost me less than it would have to purchase the worming medication every quarter. And, as it turns out, each worm burden count done on the faeces has proved negative, so I'm glad I haven't been filling his belly full of dog wormers. ETA: And the suggestion that we aren't harming our dogs? How do we know? On the homeopathy debate: there's a great documentary to look at it. see, eg, http://topdocumentar...omeopathy-test/ clip from that site: Homeopathy was pioneered over 200 years ago. Practitioners and patients are convinced it has the power to heal. Today, some of the most famous and influential people in the world, including pop stars, politicians, footballers and even Prince Charles, all use homeopathic remedies. Yet according to traditional science, they are wasting their money.Skeptic James Randi is so convinced that homeopathy will not work, that he has offered $1m to anyone who can provide convincing evidence of its effects. For the first time in the programme's history, Horizon conducts its own scientific experiment, to try and win his money. If they succeed, they will not only be $1m richer – they will also force scientists to rethink some of their fundamental beliefs. The bottom line, if you watch the doco or follow other attempts to test the scientific validity of homeopathy, is that it is a crock. Prayer is just as effective. On the other hand, both homeopathy and prayer fulfill the first dictate of the Hippocratic Oath: they do no harm. That may not be true of some of the medications we commonly use on dogs. The fact that homeopathic cures seem to work for many people is evidence that we over-medicate. If a 'do-nothing' medicine seems to work, there was no need to medicate. My father was a doctor. One of the things he said was nice about being a doctor was that fact that most complaints resolve themselves within two weeks . . . thus any 'cure' he prescribed was likely to work. Homeopathic medicines are a great placebo. There may be some exceptions. Calendula cerate, a homeopathic remedy, is great for burns and wounds. But the normal homeopathic routine about diluting and diluting and diluting to get extremely weak solutions has not been validated by scientific testing . . . despite many efforts to validate it.

You've got a great topic there. The dog bite/attack question is a great one for pointing out biases and the effects of how data are handled (eg, normalising the data by the number of dogs). You also need to be careful about definitions. In many US areas, Staffies, Staffie X's and some other bull breeds are considered pit bulls. You should find it pretty easy to see that there are strong sentiments on both sides of the debate. Also, beware of any comments without documentation. Eg, the Labrador Retriever, not the Golden Retriever, is the most common pedigree dog in Canada, and has been for many years. Neither breed shows up as important in Canadian dog bite statistics. YOu also have to be cautious about the definition of 'bite'. Minor bites of kids by the family dog usually don't get reported, but some sources count them. It's rare for sources to differentiate bites that had 'cause' . . . eg, dogs that bite children who torture them. I have taught stats at Uni level . . . I would advise against trying to get to the 'truth' on this one. Much better to use it as a demonstration of how hard it can be to determine the truth.

I disagree, no need to be snotty to anyone, popular breed or not. I agree . . . no need to be snotty, and it's ugly to do so. I said such breeders can afford to be snotty. Might also note that breeders with much sought-after pups often get frayed around the edges by getting several phone calls and emails a day. It would be good if they were uniformly polite to callers, but that doesn't always happen. As is occasionally pointed out in these forums, some doggy people have better dog skills than people skills. The puppy buyers with better etiquette are more likely to get a pup where pups are much in demand.

I'd guess there is no genetic test, and it would be good to have more information from the vet opthamologist . . . not filtered by a journalist . . .to make any pronouncement about what happened here. I did do some research regarding testing but everything goes out the window when you start dealing with 'Labtrevers'....... What goes out the window? Golden x Labradors can be CERF'd. See http://www.vmdb.org/hybridinfo.html With respect to genetic testing for hereditary eye disease, Labs and Goldies both get tested for cPRA . . . same test . . . same gene . . . but PRA isn't a cataract and doesn't show up in neonates.

The market, and the appropriate strategy for placing pups, varies between breeds. If you've got Bostons or Frenchies, and have a dozen interested buyers for every pup you can produce, you can afford to be a bit snotty about how would-be puppy buyers approach you. If you've got one of those breeds where its hard to find appropriate homes (I'm thinking of someone who had a litter of 10 Afghans and ended out keeping 8 of them because they could not find proper homes), its a different story.

There are many ways a dog can end out blind. There are genetic tests to rule out blindness caused by a recessive gene (PRA, where the RA stands for retinal atrophy . . . which affects the retina, while cataracts affect the lens. My favorite Lab health site, Wing-And-Wave Labradors, says the following about cataracts: http://www.labbies.com/eye.htm Cataracts The lens is the part of the eye which functions to bring objects to correct focus on the retina. A cataract is any opacity occurring in the lens affecting its transparency. In most cases the formation of cataracts is associated with abnormal water and calcium content within the lens substance. Causes for these abnormal chemical levels range from environmental, to metabolic, to hereditary, and can occur during the development of the lens (developmental cataracts) or be a result of degenerative changes after development has occurred (degenerative cataracts). Severity of the disorder ranges from non-progressive and slight, in which there may be no interference with vision, to progressive, in which there is a slow and gradual loss of transparency. Age of onset: Birth to 6 years; senile cataracts (those associated with old-age) present in dogs at 9-10 yrs of age. Symptoms: Bluish-white or milky appearance of the lens; blurred vision. Treatment: Many dogs are able to see quite well despite the existence of lens opacities. There is no current method for treatment of cataracts other than surgical removal. There are two common techniques for cataract removal: 1) extracapsular extraction in which the lens capsule is opened and the lens is expressed through the opening, or 2) intracapsular extraction in which the entire lens and capsule is removed. The extracapsular method is usually the preferred method because it imposes less risks of secondary complications to the patient; however, the intracapsular method yields better visual results in the patient. I'd guess there is no genetic test, and it would be good to have more information from the vet opthamologist . . . not filtered by a journalist . . .to make any pronouncement about what happened here.

Exactly. Biting dogs are not flavour of the month. That's why it's more useful to be prepared to do a bit of defensive dog walking than to worry who is at fault. The Law gives kids a much higher status than dogs. . . . and you cannot count on sympathy if your dog bites some stranger's kid. No more than you can count on sympathy if you hit a kid who runs out in front of your car. btw, Kudos to the OP . .. who is absolutely right in calling it a Tricky Scenario. It is tricky. Unless you score high on psychopath tests, you should be able to feel sympathy for both the dog walker and the Mum. Good that this potential conflict got headed off.

I once had a GSD-oriented friend who found a source of second hand conveyer belts and cut them up for the dogs. His destroyed most toys, including Jolly balls and Cuz balls, in no time. The conveyer belting stood up pretty well. I like to give cheap paint rollers (not used) to mine. The fiberousness slows them down, and at a few bucks a pop, who cares if they get destroyed fairly quickly.