DogsAndTheMob

Looking at their scale of charges, the discount is substantial IF the fee is paid before the first of August. For a desexed dog, the RDOL drops the fee from $124 to $74 before 1st August but is $162 with no RDOL available if paid on or after 1st August. I wonder if it means that anyone who acquires a dog during the other 11 months of the year can’t get the RDOL discount for that dog. I agree that their fees are steep. The enforcement process seems even more harsh,,, two months from sending out initial notices to handing over the infringements to the court system for enforcement does not allow much leeway for people who are in hospital or struggling with homelessness, for example. In either case, it might take more than two months for the initial notice to catch up with them. I also wonder about the cost/benefit ratio. I don’t see how it will enforce responsible dog ownership, or even payment of fees, by irresponsible people. Some responsible people will hurry to pay overlooked fees but will those payments come close to covering the enforcement costs for those who don’t pay?

I’m sceptical. I doubt if they’re targeting the people who never bother to register, desex or properly care for their dogs because there is no easy way to identify those people and their dogs and it might be challenging to enforce payment. The fact that they’re able to quote such precise numbers and their stated goal of “helping ensure they had the most up to date information for dogs and dog owners” lead me to suspect that they’re targeting dogs which were previously registered but haven’t been registered this year. That’s fair for those who haven’t bothered to re-register but it seems a harsh outcome for those who are grieving but have failed to notify council of their dog’s death. I also feel sorry for those who, in these harsh economic times, may have to skimp on necessities to pay the annual registration fee. With this group, the enforced payment of the annual registration fee may backfire if the owners can’t pay so are forced to surrender the dog to the council pound. Edited to add: The substantial discount for holders of a Responsible Dog Owner License is an excellent idea. I hope they make it accessible for people who are not literate in English. https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/dogs-animals/responsible-dog-owner-licence/Pages/apply-responsible-dog-owner-licence.aspx

I’m open to correction but I think that’s coincidence. Murray River Retrievers have been a breed in development for many years and are now recognised and registered by Dogs Australia. Here is the Dogzonline listing for them. https://www.dogzonline.com.au/breeds/community/murray-river-retriever.asp t looks as if Dogs NSW took it seriously. They posted a link to the announcement on 2nd April. https://www.dogsnsw.org.au/members/news-and-updates/murray-river-retriever-requirements-for-registration-press-release/ and here’s a registration form from Dogs Victoria. https://dogsvictoria.org.au/media/6374/registration-of-murray-river-retriever-2025-form.pdf

Dogs Australia has announced that it will accept re-registration of Murray River Retrievers. https://dogsaustralia.org.au/media/10316/da-press-release_murray-river-retriever.pdf

That doesn’t sound like a good idea to me. The fact that he worked well for you at home doesn’t mean that he’ll work well for someone else in a very different environment. Also, a different style of handling could adversely affect his confidence and his understanding of your handling style. Many years ago, I lent my obedience competition dog to a very skilled handler to handle in a display. (The handler went on to become one of the top obedience triallers in the country.) Despite her skill, it took me a long time to fix the problem she created by correcting him for actions she’d inadvertently cued with her body language.

I think the Crufts Vulnerable Breed Competition is a great idea, but I wonder whether the more popular breeds are almost as vulnerable. In terms of breed preservation, the most important factor is not the number of dogs born or even the number of breeding dogs but rather the number of dogs that will contribute to the breed in the long term. This number reduces generation by generation and has now done so for well over a century. Firstly, in most breeds, only a small proportion of puppies are registered as main register. This protects kennels’ reputations but I don’t know how much it protects the dogs from careless breeding outside the registry. It DOES reduce the effective population size for these breeds within the internationally recognised registries. Secondly, only some of the main register dogs will be bred and a few amongst those will contribute disproportionately to the next generation. There are sometimes very sound health, temperament and conformation reasons to exclude a dog from a breeding program but often the decision to breed one dog in preference to his equally sound sibling is based on chance. A show dog may be preferred because his flashier markings have caught the judges’ eyes or a working gun dog may achieve success because he has been trained more skilfully or campaigned more heavily. Breeders overlook the big contribution that his sibling could make, if bred selectively alongside his more successful brother - the potential to increase breeding population size and reduce inbreeding in future generations while retaining traits valued by the breeder. Thirdly, only a small proportion of kennels contribute to the breed in the long term. A lot of small and midsize kennels are dedicated to improving the breed and produce excellent quality dogs but lack the “name” and the success that would attract interest from other breeders. Their dogs are excellent ambassadors for the breed but don’t contribute to the gene pool in the long term. Finally, even the popularity of very successful kennels and bloodlines may wane over time, as breeders age and participate less in the dog world. If the breed is lucky, some of their dogs may make lasting contributions to the genetics of the breed. However, as preferences change, the qualities inherited by the descendants of their dogs may be overlooked by other breeders. I’ve seen that happen and it makes me sad… so much dedication to the breed just going to waste in the long term. The long term effects are a loss of heterogeneity - and arguably a loss of vitality - in individual dogs and a loss of genetic diversity across even popular breeds. After more than a century, I fear that I’m seeing the consequences of these genetic bottlenecks. I’m not saying the popular breeds will die out. Most won’t. They’ll be maintained by dogs bred outside the internationally recognised registries. But I think problems will increase within the popular registries. I’ll give you an example. I recently saw a discussion about Golden Retrievers in North America. Golden Retrievers have a high cancer rate, with a frightening number of very young dogs succumbing to lymphoma and slightly older dogs dying suddenly from haemangiocarcinoma. In this discussion, someone asked where they could find a puppy that wasn’t descended from a particular kennel whose dogs were rumoured to be at higher risk of cancer. They were told that it would be difficult to find a puppy whose pedigree didn’t trace back to that kennel. Whether or not the rumours about that kennel were true, I find it frightening that one kennel could contribute so disproportionately even to a very popular breed in one of the largest registries in the world.

Some beautiful colours in dogs and other animals may be associated with illness and discomfort. I’m saddened when aesthetic appeal is given priority over the animal’s wellbeing. I occasionally see dogs which look like homozygous Merle koolies, with extreme white colouring and pink eye-rims. They usually look uncomfortable in bright sunlight. I have seen a few with micropthalmia of one eye.

https://embarkvet.com/resources/embark-introduces-merle-coat-color-testing/ These details on Merle genetics are fascinating. I’ve seen a few genetically Merle border collies that appeared to be black and white, at least at a casual glance. This explains why.

Let’s take the discussion on Merle Poms out of the lost dog discussion. It seems that the decision to add the Merle colour to the AKC breed standard for Pomeranians was controversial. https://www.thedogpress.com/ClubNews/Tail-Wags-Dog_Coats-109.asp I don’t think it was a good decision. It is feasible that the gene was present in the breed, masked by the ee phenotype and other pale colours, but that in itself is an argument against approving it. The presence of a gene that is harmful in the homozygous form but can be masked by other coat colours in the heterozygous form is a recipe for problems. In breeds like collies, there is a longtime understanding that breeding Merle to sable is a bad idea. However, sub-setting breeds into separate populations based on colour exacerbates any inbreeding and population size concerns within the breed.

Not necessarily. Merle is an allowed colour for Pomeranians under the American Kennel Club breed Standard. https://www.akc.org/dog-breeds/pomeranian/ https://images.akc.org/pdf/breeds/standards/Pomeranian.pdf But very probably, yes. Whatever breeds she is, my heart goes out to her and to her owners. I hope she has been or very quickly will be returned to her owners.

I worked in a (human) allergy testing laboratory in the 2000s. The science may have moved on but at that time gut issues were considered to be quite distinct from the allergies that caused skin and respiratory symptoms. Allergies causing skin and respiratory symptoms were thought to be triggered by proteins whereas gut sensitivities were more often triggered by an inability to digest sugars (such as lactose or fructose) or by other health problems. Skin allergy testing only looked for the triggers causing skin and respiratory symptoms.

I wouldn’t be surprised if there were links between colours and behavioural traits. Genes determine the sequence of amino acid s in proteins and proteins can have multiple functions, either directly or as precursor proteins. It is feasible that a gene could code both for a colour, colour dilution or absence of colour and for some neurological or endocrine trait that affects behaviour. After all, there are known links between colour genes and health or anatomical abnormalities, such dilute blue and alopecia, homozygous Merle and micropthalmia, and extended white and deafness. It’s a long time since I’ve read Horse Colour Explained by Jeanette Gower, but that book has a lot of interesting information on associations between colour genetics and health in horses. I can’t say that I’ve noticed a linkage between colour and behaviour in dogs, but it seems to me that long coated dogs often tend to be more mellow in temperament than short coated dogs, even within the same breed or closely related breeds. Of course, that might be because their softer appearance prompts people to treat them differently, causing different environmental conditioning.

This is what I would do in your situation… Join the Border Collie club of NSW and volunteer to help out at their events, Spend several months going to (and maybe volunteering at) Obedience trials, Agility trials and conformation shows. Look at the Border Collies there to see what you like and don’t like about the breed and individual dogs. Look at the event catalogues to find who bred the dogs you like. Talk to Border Collie owners at these events (if/when they are willing to talk with you) to find out their experiences with their dogs. Be polite and patient. Many people enjoy talking about their dogs but they will be at these events to compete, not to talk to you. Remember that their dogs were not born trained. Go to local dog training clubs and talk (politely and patiently) to owners there. This will give you an opportunity to meet dogs in training and pet owners with their border collies. When you’ve identified breeders whose dogs you like and who perform the required health testing, consider getting an adult dog. No one can adequately assess the suitability of a 8 week old puppy for a specialist role such as assistance dog work. Breeders sometimes need to rehome lovely adult dogs; they will have a much better idea whether these dogs are suitable for assistance dog training.

I think the video included in this news item shows two different dogs. The dog shown in most of the images is a short-backed dog with white toes. The dog seen in a CCV image being held by a woman after it killed her cat, Penelope, is a long-backed dog without white toes.

I hope the council is completely transparent in providing information on how many dogs were symptomatic, how many dogs were titre-tested to check their immunity and how many were euthanised for convenience, cost-saving or “just in case”. Although I accept that difficult decisions sometimes need to be made, I find it difficult to believe that none of the 21 dogs had protection from previous vaccination.