NorthernStarPits

And they certainly arent helping in this thread. I dont know of any APBT owner in this thread who can not manage the breed appropriatly, I do know one previous owner in this thread who didnt manage though, 2 dogs dead, or perhaps just the APBT one?. RB laws or not, a gits a git.

I highly suspect because court challenges rarly involve those other breeds, anyone can guess breeds, for fun and games, along with shelters etc, it happens all the time in pounds.

Yes as a traditionally functional breed they do usually come in many shapes and sizes, some smaller than staffy size, some as big as a lab.

Jdavis a Pit Bull club secretary cant even positivly ID a Pit Bull.

Caffiened I think most 'pitty' owners would manage there dogs wisely, I have rubbed shoulders ( and keyboards) with many over the years and this is what I have seen. I am sure most beagle owners, staffy owners and every other person with what ever breed they have just the same, majority would manage the dogs wisely, some may be bad eggs but it's the same in all from what I have seen. Bad apples fall from all trees. No more so than others. But when focus is on one all negativity gets highlighted. The gits who cant manage the dogs cant turn around any sort of perception, and I wouldnt want them to try.

.. edit computer accident

The proof is in the pudding about Breed Specific Laws in print and on the news, we have had it for over 15 yrs. It is a law that means diddly squat in the real world from the start, and I think most know that. But some like to think it works and is great and is enforcable! well they keep on telling themselves that enough times and it becomes truth in a rose coloured sort of way LMAO lol.

"he may not have even been declared with an NOI, he may have been breed assesed negative or found to be partially bred then temperament tested and passed." title of the thread

Exactly jdavis, how is he going to be forced? he may not have even been declared with an NOI, he may have been breed assesed negative or found to be partially bred then temperament tested and passed. Look to the title of the thread. If failed, and an enclosure is built to appese council, how is it enforced. A buffoon dog owner is a buffoon dog owner, RB laws or not.

Fantastic another 1 liner

IF If If lol. What is so hard to understand that this bloke in all probability wouldnt have cared about the RB law? a fine lol look what happened. Are declared RB's monitered 24/7, of course not.

Hmmm keep em comming OB1. APBT on whose account, ah yes the OP's neighbour said so, not the council, not anyone else. Of course I feel for the old fella. Let me ask you this. This guy sounded real irresponsible yeah, could'nt even manage the dog under a normal law, what makes you think that anything would have been different if the dog had been declared by an NOI by Warley some time back? An irresponsible owner is an irresponsible owner after all is it not? whats the thread about sheridan?

haha ok then

So, you're okay with an old dog, indeed any dog, being attacked in its backyard? Interesting. Nope not at all, but it's typicle for a responce like that I have noticed, I am sure many see it. Any more 1 liners to come? or is that it for your input to the topic titled, should have called the ranger?

Someone who allows their dog to savage another in its own backyard is irresponsible. A pity that such owners can't wear a collar indicating they're dangerous. A pity that such people are allowed to own dogs at all. It is the dog that wears the collar; it is the dog that gets pts because its owner is a moron. It sure is hey, it happens what 100's of times each and every day across this great nation of ours.