Has it ever occurred to anyone that the GCC would have known all along that the AST & APBT were one & the same but chose not pursue that seemingly obvious stategy in the courts because they actually did respect the status of an ANKC registered pure breed?
This litigant is probably a victim of the perpetuated misinformation regarding the AST not being the genuine, bred for conformation & temperament APBT , which is now in mortal danger of extinction in this country because one silly person didn't do enough personal research & instead relied on information proferred by equally uninformed or dishonest people.
They had the case won when the court amazingly ruled this progeny of unregistered progenitors was in fact an AST. How that came about is beyond belief. They should have quit then & there. I have given her the benefit of the doubt & say she was a victim because surely no one would be so stupid as to wittingly destroy their own case with their own evidence.
The GCC is quite within their rights to ban a generally regarded as socially undesirable "breed" from their precincts. It's their solution" that is obhorrent.
Now they have another breed to pursue if they feel so inclined. As do other precincts, country wide". if this tragedy runs it's full course.
This litigant, her advisors & supportersl will to blame. Fools, one & all.
Oh what tangled webs we weave when first we practice to deceive.