tdierikx

I don't know what the rules are in SA, but in NSW the animal should be scanned at the time of being handed in and if chipped, the person surrendering needs to show that they are in fact the owner listed on the chip, then formally sign over said dog to the shelter, etc... In states where chipping is not mandatory, it's not necessarily the first thing the shelter is going to check for I suppose - they would most likely take the easy option and assume that the person surrendering the dog is telling the truth about owning the dog. However, in this case, the dogs had been at the shelter for some period of time before they were scanned for a chip, and it has come to light that the person who surrendered them may not have actually been the owner listed on said chips. The fact that the shelter has had someoone working with 2 obviously frightened dogs in that environment really is moot... the person who surrendered the dogs is NOT the owner listed on the chips, and the person who IS listed on the chips wants them back... it should be fairly simple to resolve the issue - but no - now the owner on the chip is being told that they will have to cough up some exhorbitant sum of money for the animals' care whilst in the shelter - or a general member of the public can come adopt the dogs for a paltry $400 for the pair. Please show me where it's not a case of extortion being exercised here? T.

You know what I'd love to see? I'd love to see large numbers of registered breeders breeding awesome dogs for the pet market. We can't deny that there is a market for pet dogs, and we can't deny that there are some really good breeders breeding nice quality dogs of all sorts of breeds. Wouldn't it be brilliant if there were some way to marry the two camps? T.

Mine can be masters of the "my mum doesn't feed or love me" eyes... Trouble does the most lovely beg too... T.

They really don't want them to get adopted, do they? T.

JRT Rescue is Jill... http://www.jrtrescue.net/ - phone number on the website... T.

They could be "adopted" from the RSPCA as a private citizen... no need to let them know you are with rescue... T.

Her ears are getting bigger all the time... to match her feet methinks... lol! T.

She is getting big, I'll agree... but she's my baby girl... *grin* No-one would have thought she'd get this big when she was born... she and her littermates were all pretty small compared to the other litter of pups we had from a smaller mother - and they were all bigger than Harper and her littermates for the first 6 weeks! The other litter of pups were never going to grow big like Harper though... Doesn't Pickles have the most beautiful teefies? At least something about her is perfect... lol! T.

Awww.... T.

Surely someone involved knows a single person who doesn't live at home, or a young couple with no kids? They don't need to keep the dogs - can hand them over to someone in your group 10 mins down the road from the RSPCA premises... T.

Seeing as I've been busy populating Katdogs' thread about her new puppy Sammy and neglecting my duty of taking photos of Harper - I decided to pull my finger out this afternoon and get some of her playing with Pickles. Note that Harper is a tad taller than Pickles at the withers now... lol! And she weighs more than Pickles now too! Isn't she just so purty? T.

How much are the RSPCA trying to extort from the breeder? T.

If you believe the AR nuts, all pedigreed dogs are incredibly unhealthy, and all pound/shelter dogs have "issues", and all pet shop pups come from atrocious puppy mills... are there any dogs fit for the pet market? Oh yes... the BYB mob... *sigh* T.

I have a 450D that doesn't see much action now I have a 60D... what price range are you looking at? T.

... and Jodie ball throwing exercise... *grin* T.

Really though, it's not about how much a dog costs as a determinating factor of it's "worthiness" to be a great pet. A lot of poorly bred animals in pet shops carry a price tag much higher than a well bred pedigree... but they come with a fancy name, so they must be special, right? As for the vet bills accrued for a pedigreed dog as opposed to a mutt - people actually tend to be more likely to take their pedigreed dog to the vet for minor ailments than they are for a mutt with the same ailment... You will never get a 100% guarantee of perfect health or perfect temperament when buying a pup/dog of any breed or mix... but you're more likely to get a better foundation for that good health and/or temperament with a pedigreed dog. Don't forget that owners also play a big role in establishing and maintaining both the physical and mental health of their dog. T.

Hmmm... decisions, decisions... Reading some of the posts about slow focus with the Tamron 90mm, I'm starting to think I may give it a miss and save up for the Canon 100mm L... but then again, I could get the Tamron 90mm, and then keep saving for the Canon 100mm L, while getting in some macro practice with the Tamron... T.

... and Facebook is the home of all truths... ? T.

Rascalmyshadow - you can't really tar all pedigreed dogs with the same brush as the one that didn't work out for you... just like all mutts aren't going to be suitable for all people either. The reality is that you are more likely to get a dog with the traits you are wanting from a breeder who breeds for those traits and can give a certain amount of guarantee of same due to knowing their lines well. My personal preference is for mutts also - but if I were looking for predictability, I'd be heading for a well bred pedigreed dog every time. Oh - and how much a pup is bought for is not necessarily an indicator of how "good" it is going to be for your circumstances... I'm a big believer in how we raise our dogs as a huge part of how they turn out... and I'm not so sure about a dog being born "bad" or "broken"... WE have the ability to influence a lot of things about our dogs' health and temperament as owners, and laying "blame" for things that haven't turned out shouldn't automatically go to the breeder of the dog. T.

My 60D is heavier than my 450D... doesn't wobble so easy... lol! T.

I'm definitely getting better at holding the camera still when taking photos... and I'm usually on Sports mode for taking photos of moving dogs... so this macro stuff is a little outside my comfort zone... T.

I knew you'd like the Jodie pics MUP... isn't she one of the prettiest Kelpie's you've ever seen? I'll let you in on a secret... Jodie is my fave dog that doesn't live with me... she's awesome! And she has shared her ball with Sammy a few times, and takes it back when he loses interest after 10 seconds... lol! ... and I'm really chuffed with that first shot of Stevie... it can be tricky getting nice pics of black dogs... T.

I don't have a macro lens - just a Tamron 18-270mm and the Macro setting on the 60D... here's my attempt to take some macro shots. This little guy was about 1cm across when fully spread out... These weren't too bad for hand held and a slight breeze blowing... T.

How far away do you get when taking the bee and fly type shots with the Canon 100mm FM? I'm loving all of your macro shots... and definitely starting to think I need to get the Canon lens... but I'll have to save up longer... or win Lotto... T.

There's Luka!! What a beautiful boy he's growing up to be! Love the shots of the aerial Frenchie... they may be short in stature, but they are definitely huge in spunk... lol! Can't believe the Frenchie babies are 1 now... where did that year go indeed! T.