emilee

Yes Kirty and neither of her parents nor any other of the dogs I have here have had eye or airway problems, in fact most of my dogs will give any breed a run for their money

If that's a case then it makes a mockery of the protocol. How did you find out? I breed bulldogs and have friends that are over there - also I am on the facebook pages of friends of the owner, it is nothing more than a sad political stunt - there is a facebook page in support of her owner - just search for Team Jenny, the profile pic is of her winning Bulldog of the Year

she is a stunningly sound bulldog bitch who was DQ'ed for a pin prick scar on her eye from an old injury. She was also Bulldog of the Year 2011 and a very worthy winner

Karndean Flooring solves all your problems. www.karndean.com.au Looks and feels like the real thing but no slip even when its wet. We have it in the kitchen and the dogs can run flat out across it. It has a protective layer on it so it doesn't get marked and scratched and its quiet to walk on.

Paint me like your French Girls [/img]

Oh shouldn't of had that last piece of pie!

I have the Satin Soft one in front of me & it says it is 96% natural with Coix seed extract, Witch hazel, Allantoin, Vitamin B6 & Epilobium leischeri extract (what ever that is?)It then goes on to list the ingredients...too many for me to put here, but it does have Sodium Lauryl Sulphate in it. I will have to get the Sensitive Skin one back off my daughter & see what that has in it. If that's any help. I normally use Alloveen, but have trouble getting it to lather up & usually end up using almost a whole bottle in one wash. Love the Satin Soft - I use it on everyone, and the Baby Dog is lovely too, gentle enough for clean ups on baby pups when mum doesn't quite do a good enough job

I got some samples of the "Yu" range of shampoos that you have on your website at the Royal,they are just lovely, the dogs smell amazing

From here : antler link

There was an existing population prior to restriction. I have been led to believe that this is not the case. I have not been shown any records to prove the case so I stand corrected if this is so. Two pure bred Pit Bulls were brought legally into this country many years ago and both went to the Gulf Country. To cut a long story short the dog was shot on the chain as he was so savage and totally unmanageable. The bitch was never bred from and also shot to get her off the shoulder of the owner as she had pinned him down. Just your trivia for the day :D I think you heard a story form a friend of a friend of a friend.The dogs were imported from about 1983 onwards until the import ban was brought in in 1992 so that is a 9 year period.I dont know how many dogs were imported but I could find out not that it matters but I would estimate it to be about 3 dozen maybe more in that period of legal importation and that is not accounting for semen imported.In that 20 years they have been banned from importation it has not stifled the gene pool.They honestly beleived they woulbe peter out but they were wrong.They will not be bred out of existence so they need to come up with some common sense policy for all dog owners becuase they are here to stay.There is still a diverse enough gene pool that they will never be eradicated from the Australian landscape.I am not saying this for bragging rights it is just fact,so if the policy makers read this understand it is fact and come up with something that fits. Dont know of your story but in 1985 2 dogs were imported into north queensland by a gentleman and they were extensivley bred from and were from a certain bloodline that is fairly rare these days.That may be the dogs younawere told about.However they were not the first dogs to enter Australia in fact far from it. More than 3 dozen, In Victoria alone there were 60 legally imported

no - it makes yeast type problems worse. The active ingredient in Angels Eyes is not used as a yeast treatment. It is used for respiratory infections

Are you serious? All they care about is profit not responsibly rehoming. They pay around $35 for one puppy and the markup is massive. $1000 + at least each pup. Which Is why they will NOT STOP. They are not looking to responsibly rehome at all, they are after the markups! Seriously. So you are saying every petshop exists for the sole purpose of selling pups at a huge markup - well I'm sure some of the ethical pet shop owners will be pleased to hear that. As TD and RSD wrote - it is already being done. Seriously

and that is what we need - nothing emotive, no fingerpointing, no us versus them, and it takes away a huge chunk of the problem. Instead of puppies, with the right advice,training and suitable backup petshops could be used as one point of contact for putting people in contact with, and learning about available dogs in rescue. Not everyone wants a "rescue" dog no they don't, never said they do, and I'm by no means anti purebred - I breed and show myself, but I do not like puppies in petshops, and if petshops can't sell pups why not use them for rescue, and to balance things out they could also have contact numbers for breed clubs and Canine Orgs, our local pet shop refuses to stock puppies but does have contact numbers for breed clubs so when people ask they are pointed in the right direction.

and that is what we need - nothing emotive, no fingerpointing, no us versus them, and it takes away a huge chunk of the problem. Instead of puppies, with the right advice,training and suitable backup petshops could be used as one point of contact for putting people in contact with, and learning about available dogs in rescue.

Yes I am and yes I do and I certainly don't need your preaching nor your essay. I breed, I rescue, I train I exhibit, I health test and I assist as many people as I can. What I am trying to get across to you is that when some potential pet owner who doesn't know better reads your little spiel and gets to that line what do they think, I certainly don't need anyone telling me that because I charge money for my pups I am therefore, in your opinion,a puppy farmer. and i'll say it again for the upteenth time, im not talking about "charging" i am talking about people "breeding" their dogs for money and nothing else if that were so by what you say, i'd be putting up if breeders charge money for dogs they are a farmer but i haven't said that have i, i'd also say breeders should be charging nothing and giving away their dogs i mean its all common sense and straight forward if you have taken exception to it then don't visit my website. i stand by my little Spiel as you put it, and i have stood by it for the last 14 years thats its been there. so if i defend myself i am preaching to you when i don't know you from a bar of soap and what your experience is. i know what my experience is and i know where my heart lies. okay enough said spending time explaining myself to strangers. i've got other things to do. Once more for clarification, from your website: A puppy farmer is a person who sells their dogs for money